Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0978b976".
Did you mean:
0971b973
2009 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] JVM Backend
Hello, David
> Additional patch attached, is this suitable?
Looks good, thanks. What's about arithmetics?
>> The current big question is: how you're planning to deal with
>> arbitrary precision stuff which might come from LLVM IR.
> I should be able to implement that. Would arbitrary precision support
> be required for the initial commit of the backend?
I really
2009 Nov 26
2
[LLVMdev] JVM Backend
> Could you please provide some sort of "feature" test? So, we might be
> sure that the stuff won't be broken due to e.g. some API change, etc.
> Now we have a powerful FileCheck facility, so, you might just have a
> one .ll file and check for the JVM code emitted.
Additional patch attached, is this suitable?
>> In order to link and run the output, the LLJVM[1]
2009 Nov 26
2
[LLVMdev] JVM Backend
...atics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: llvm-jvm-test.patch.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 1003 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091126/0978b976/attachment.bin>