search for: 097773fc

...there is no reason to remove it from the source drop of the release. The binaries produced for each release shouldn't include them though. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120727/097773fc/attachment.html>

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:30:49PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > On 07/27/2012 01:01 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There > >seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also > >new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions > >are required

On 07/27/2012 01:01 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There > seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also > new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions > are required to make the staging area a reality? Is more discussion > needed? Is anyone willing to