Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "094946".
Did you mean:
0.4946
2016 Feb 08
2
LLVM Weekly - #110, Feb 8th 2016
...s
will be providing specific examples so they can be investigated. It's possible
the issue is something as simple as a different default somewhere. Benoit
Belley noted [they saw regressions due to their frontend's use of allocas in
3.7](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/094946.html).
* Lang Hames kicked off a long discussion about [error handling in LLVM
libraries](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/094804.html).
Lang has implemented a new scheme and is seeking feedback on it. There's a lot
of discussion that unfortunately I haven't had time...