search for: 094946

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "094946".

Did you mean: 0.4946
2016 Feb 08
2
LLVM Weekly - #110, Feb 8th 2016
...s will be providing specific examples so they can be investigated. It's possible the issue is something as simple as a different default somewhere. Benoit Belley noted [they saw regressions due to their frontend's use of allocas in 3.7](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/094946.html). * Lang Hames kicked off a long discussion about [error handling in LLVM libraries](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/094804.html). Lang has implemented a new scheme and is seeking feedback on it. There's a lot of discussion that unfortunately I haven't had time...