Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "093d3290".
2012 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Code Ownership
On 12 November 2012 15:55, Meador Inge <meadori at codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Another point to address is whether there can be more than one owner in a
> particular area.
There might be more than one code expert per area, which can be
referenced by the code owner, but I wouldn't have more than one owner.
Owning part of the code means you'll have to keep a sharper eye on
2012 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Code Ownership
...gt; LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
--
Thanks,
Justin Holewinski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121112/093d3290/attachment.html>
2012 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Code Ownership
On 11/12/2012 09:35 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/11/12 15:11, Meador Inge wrote:
>> On 11/11/2012 11:58 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>
>>>> Is there a particular sub-system size that makes sense to mark as owned? I have been
>>>> reworking the library call simplification infrastructure recently and will be happy
>>>> to sign up as