Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "09365f34".
2004 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Notes on the release notes for the fifth public release of LLVM
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> > Yuck... what about the C runtime? I can compile a C/C++ program on Unix
> > and copy the bytecode file over to Windows and then (eventually)
> > generate assembler that NASM can turn into a binary. But what to link
> > against? Microsoft's C runtime library? C++ runtime is even worse, as
> > name mangling is
2004 Nov 17
4
[LLVMdev] Re: Notes on the release notes for the fifth public release of LLVM
> Yuck... what about the C runtime? I can compile a C/C++ program on Unix
> and copy the bytecode file over to Windows and then (eventually)
> generate assembler that NASM can turn into a binary. But what to link
> against? Microsoft's C runtime library? C++ runtime is even worse, as
> name mangling is completely different. Then there's __cdecl vs
> __fastcall. VC++