Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "092017".
2017 Sep 13
0
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
...ossibly at different optimization levels (O2, O3, LTO, PGO etc and combinations) should provide data-driven insight into costs/benefits.
Cheers
Gerolf
>
> Thanks again,
> Hal
>
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092017.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092017.html>
>> [2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096266.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096266.html>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>...
2017 Sep 13
3
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
...nt optimization levels (O2, O3, LTO, PGO
> etc and combinations) should provide data-driven insight into
> costs/benefits.
>
> Cheers
> Gerolf
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks again,
> Hal
>
>
> Adam
>
> [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092017.html
> [2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096266.html
>
>
>
>
> * Sincerely, Hal (on behalf of myself, Tobias Grosser, and Michael Kruse,
> with feedback from several other active Polly developers) We thank the
> numerous people who have contributed to t...
2017 Sep 12
5
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
...(and maybe
some HPC environments) with straightforwardly-presented C code. It's
only now that this has been fixed that I find the possibility of
integrating this in production interesting.
Thanks again,
Hal
>
> Adam
>
> [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092017.html
> [2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096266.html
>
>
>> *
>> Sincerely,
>> Hal (on behalf of myself, Tobias Grosser, and Michael Kruse, with
>> feedback from**several other active Polly developers)
>>
>> We thank the numerous p...
2017 Sep 22
0
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
...; Hal
>
> >
> >Cheers
> >Gerolf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Thanks again,
> >>Hal
> >>
> >>>
> >>>Adam
> >>>
> >>>[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092017.html
> >>>[2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096266.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>*
> >>>>Sincerely,
> >>>>Hal (on behalf of myself, Tobias Grosser, and Michael Kruse, with
> >>>>feedback f...
2017 Sep 22
4
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
...first focus would certainly be on pragma-driven
enablement.
Thanks again,
Hal
>
> Cheers
> Gerolf
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Hal
>>
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>> [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092017.html
>>> [2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096266.html
>>>
>>>
>>>> *
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Hal (on behalf of myself, Tobias Grosser, and Michael Kruse, with
>>>> feedback from**several other active Pol...
2017 Sep 01
10
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
**
*Hi everyone,As you may know, stock LLVM does not provide the kind of
advanced loop transformations necessary to provide good performance on
many applications. LLVM's Polly project provides many of the required
capabilities, including loop transformations such as fission, fusion,
skewing, blocking/tiling, and interchange, all powered by
state-of-the-art dependence analysis. Polly also