Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "09077d81".
Did you mean:
0.077481
2013 Oct 27
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On Oct 27, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Now for the carrot: if we go with this plan, then immediately after
>>>>> branching for 3.4, we would be able to use the vast majority of
>>>>> C++11 features, targeting the following as the oldest toolchains
>>>>> supported
2013 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...could force some distros to compile Clang more than once, but it
could also mean people would migrate faster to more modern compilers.
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131027/09077d81/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote:
>> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
>>
>>>> One short term caveat: Windows is special.
>>
>> s/Windows/Visual Studio.
>>
>> MinGW has the latest and greatest gcc.