Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "088b9c8a".
2013 Feb 20
1
[LLVMdev] [RFC] NoBuiltin Attribute
...not inlining incompatible attributes.
>
Right, but I think that's a silly limitation, fixable by doing it right and marking call sites.
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130220/088b9c8a/attachment.html>
2013 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] NoBuiltin Attribute
On Feb 20, 2013 7:58 AM, "Krzysztof Parzyszek" <kparzysz at codeaurora.org>
wrote:
>
> On 2/19/2013 11:11 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>
>>
>> I still really have no idea what problem you think you are solving.
>
>
> Dealing with different attributes on different functions.
>
> --- a.c ---
> void func_a() {
> printf(...);
> }
>
>
2013 Feb 20
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] NoBuiltin Attribute
On 2/19/2013 11:11 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> I still really have no idea what problem you think you are solving.
Dealing with different attributes on different functions.
--- a.c ---
void func_a() {
printf(...);
}
--- b.c ---
void func_b() {
printf(...);
func_a();
}
a.c is compiled with no-builtin-printf, b.c has no such options.
The prototype approach (no-builtin on the