search for: 07f04bb0

Hi Tom, On 24 Jun 2013, at 17:08, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > I've come up with the following dot release 'rules': > > + Dot releases will follow the same procedure as major releases, which > means stable patches must be approved by the appropriate code owner and > that dot releases will have the same testing and qualification requirements.

Hi, A few months ago, I mentioned I was interested in helping to make dot releases for LLVM 3.3. Now that 3.3 has been released, I would like to kick off the process of collecting bug fixes and merging them into the 3.3 branch. I reviewed the previous discussion about dot releases: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-April/060821.html and I've come up with the following dot