search for: 073448

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "073448".

Did you mean: 0.3448
2017 May 18
0
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
...date at the time, or actually thought that there would be no DST issues in December ;-) ) > -pd I think the former. This was about fixing a segmentation fault problem (thread from Dec 6, 2016, on the R-devel mailing list, starting here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-December/073448.html ) mostly, but the 2nd part of the regression test evidently needs more thought than I had put there. Being pretty "stretched" time wise currently, I'm happy for timezone-portable propositions to change the test. Martin
2017 May 18
2
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
> On 18 May 2017, at 14:58 , Martyn Plummer <plummerM at iarc.fr> wrote: > > > >> On 18 May 2017, at 14:51, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 18 May 2017, at 13:47 , Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Correction: Also dlt uses the default timezone, but POSIXlt is not recalculated