Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "073448".
Did you mean:
0.3448
2017 May 18
0
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
...date at the time, or actually thought that there would be no DST issues in December ;-) )
> -pd
I think the former. This was about fixing a segmentation fault problem
(thread from Dec 6, 2016, on the R-devel mailing list, starting
here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-December/073448.html )
mostly, but the 2nd part of the regression test evidently needs
more thought than I had put there.
Being pretty "stretched" time wise currently, I'm happy for
timezone-portable propositions to change the test.
Martin
2017 May 18
2
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
> On 18 May 2017, at 14:58 , Martyn Plummer <plummerM at iarc.fr> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 18 May 2017, at 14:51, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 18 May 2017, at 13:47 , Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Correction: Also dlt uses the default timezone, but POSIXlt is not recalculated