Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "06e8108d".
2011 Dec 14
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC]Extending lib/Linker to support bitcode "shared objects"
> Is it more clear now? If not, I would like to give it another try and
> write much more details and examples.
I am still not completely sure I understand the use case. In particular
since you say you want a bitcode module in the end, I don't understand
how this is different from using llvm-link, it doesn't complain about
undefined symbols...
Can you provide an example? What are
2011 Dec 14
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC]Extending lib/Linker to support bitcode "shared objects"
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > $ llc bar.bc -filetype=obj -o bar.o
> > $ clang -shared -o bar.so bar.o
> > $ clang -use-gold-plugin foo.o bar.so -o t
> >
> > Is that correct? In particular, "lld t" should show a dependency on
> bar.
> > Any