Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "06df756b".
2012 Feb 06
3
Meet the new maintainer
At 14:16 06.02.2012, you wrote:
>Olav,
>
>A change like this could easily break the format. That would be a bad choice.
That makes sense. Explains why it is not there today.
>On the other hand, an informational 'application' block could be added in a way that does not break the format, and this would even be backwards compatible since 'application' blocks have