Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "066733".
Did you mean:
006733
2008 Sep 04
0
[LLVMdev] Codegen/Register allocation question.
...allocator supposed to mark EAX as killed? (doesn't seem as if
> it should - it was killed before regalloc got involved).
> Or have I missed something else?
It's a bug. The assertion is too strict. I've fixed it.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080901/066733.html
Evan
>
>
> bugpoint produced bytecode is attached, but I don't suppose it's much
> help without the allocator. That's packaged as an LLVM project at the
> moment - so if it'll help you debug I can send you a copy.
>
> Cheers,
> Lang.
>
>
>
>...
2008 Sep 03
2
[LLVMdev] Codegen/Register allocation question.
Hi LLVMers,
I have finally sorted out licensing issues and found some time, so I'm
trying to port my PBQP register allocator to 2.4 in order to
contribute it (if you want it). I've run into a bug that has me
confused though.
I'm currently failing the following assertion:
llc: VirtRegMap.cpp:1733:
void<unnamed>::LocalSpiller::RewriteMBB(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&,