Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "064426".
2013 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] Add a 'notrap' function attribute?
FYI, see also the previous discussion about "speculatable":
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-July/064426.html
I think such an attribute should be added.
In the thread which lead up to that thread, I proposed using more
fine-grained attributes and Michael rightly pointed out the problem with
that: you'd need one for every possible form of undefined behaviour. You
listed "nofptrap", &quo...
2013 Oct 31
6
[LLVMdev] Add a 'notrap' function attribute?
Hello,
OpenCL C specifies that instructions should not trap (it is "discouraged"
in the specs). If they do, it's vendor-specific how the hardware
exceptions are handled.
It might be also the case with some other (future) languages targeting
"streamlined" parallel accelerators in an heterogeneous setting.
At least CUDA comes to mind. What about OpenACC and the new OpenMP,