Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "06155".
Did you mean:
0155
2011 Aug 26
2
[LLVMdev] Dead node removal in DAGCombiner
Is this piece of code in DAGCombiner::visitLOAD removing a dead node?
06155 if (N->use_empty()) {
06156 removeFromWorkList(N);
06157 DAG.DeleteNode(N);
06158 }
If it is, is there a reason it doesn't push its operands to the work
list as done in line 974-975?
00970 // If N has no uses, it is dead. Make sure to revisit all
N&...
2011 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] Dead node removal in DAGCombiner
Hi Akira,
> Is this piece of code in DAGCombiner::visitLOAD removing a dead node?
>
> 06155 if (N->use_empty()) {
> 06156 removeFromWorkList(N);
> 06157 DAG.DeleteNode(N);
> 06158 }
yes.
> If it is, is there a reason it doesn't push its operands to the work
> list as done in line 974-975?
>
> 00970 // If N has no uses,...
2011 Aug 27
3
[LLVMdev] OpenCL Backend
...l.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> > Hi Akira,
> >
> >> Is this piece of code in DAGCombiner::visitLOAD removing a dead node?
> >>
> >> 06155 ? ? ? ? if (N->use_empty()) {
> >> 06156 ? ? ? ? ? removeFromWorkList(N);
> >> 06157 ? ? ? ? ? DAG.DeleteNode(N);
> >> 06158 ? ? ? ? }
> >
> > yes.
> >
> >> If it is, is there a reason it doesn't push its operands to the work
> >>...