Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "05t08".
Did you mean:
0508
2019 Jul 05
2
Re: [nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:04-0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 7/4/19 1:38 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared.
> > The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the
> > size by a factor of around 10000.
>
>...
2019 Jul 05
2
Re: [nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:48-0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 7/5/19 8:21 AM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:04-0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> On 7/4/19 1:38 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> >>> In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared.
> >>&g...
2019 Jul 05
0
Re: [nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
On 7/5/19 8:21 AM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:04-0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 7/4/19 1:38 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>> In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared.
>>> The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the
>>> size by a factor of around 100...
2019 Jul 04
3
[nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
Hi all,
It seems GCC 9 does not put read-only zero-initialized variables into the BSS
section anymore; instead it is put into RODATA.
(See the thread at [0], especially [1])
In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared.
The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the
size by a factor of around 10000.
(Clang 8 and older GCCs work