search for: 058727

...design other than blind compatibility. I agree. I was puzzled by it myself until I ended up concluding that if the set of required analysis is not defined it can be an empty set, thus equivalent to "no dep checking at all needed": http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-January/058727.html Maybe the safe thing here is to rename it back to the honest "llvm.loop.parallel" or similar and we can add a separate one for the assumed_dep later on. This one would support the truly parallel loops (at least OpenMP for and OpenCL WIloops) where no compiler checking at all can be...

...ity. > > I agree. I was puzzled by it myself until I ended up concluding that > if the set of required analysis is not defined it can be an empty > set, > thus equivalent to "no dep checking at all needed": > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-January/058727.html > > Maybe the safe thing here is to rename it back to the honest > "llvm.loop.parallel" or similar and we can add a separate one for > the assumed_dep later on. This one would support the truly parallel > loops (at least OpenMP for and OpenCL WIloops) where no compile...