Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "057180".
Did you mean:
57180
2012 Jul 02
4
[LLVMdev] PROPOSAL: LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for intended fall-throughs between switch cases
...and is probably an unhealthy approach overall. So the
use of comment-only annotations is limited to manual inspections.
Some time ago I've added the 'Unintended fall-through in switch statement'
diagnostics to clang (
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120430/057180.html
).
This is a proposal to introduce clang's unintended fall-through diagnostic
to llvm/clang code.
*DESCRIPTION OF 'UNINTENDED FALL-THROUGH IN SWITCH STATEMENTS' DIAGNOSTIC
IN CLANG*
Related functionality in clang introduces several diagnostic messages and a
syntax for intended f...
2012 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] PROPOSAL: LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for intended fall-throughs between switch cases
...gt; use of comment-only annotations is limited to manual inspections.
>>>
>>> Some time ago I've added the 'Unintended fall-through in switch
>>> statement' diagnostics to clang (
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120430/057180.html
>>> ).
>>>
>>> This is a proposal to introduce clang's unintended fall-through
>>> diagnostic to llvm/clang code.
>>>
>>> *DESCRIPTION OF 'UNINTENDED FALL-THROUGH IN SWITCH STATEMENTS'
>>> DIAGNOSTIC IN CLANG*
>>&...