search for: 056c5781

...e are any problems > or anything I need to do differently. And there were. updated patches attached. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: llvm.IRBuilder.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080410/056c5781/attachment.ksh> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: llvm-gcc42.IRBuilder.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080410/056c5781/attachment-0001.ksh>

Duncan Sands wrote: >> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder and >> rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the case, I'd >> argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the old non-folding >> functionality for debugging purposes. >> > > this plan sounds good to me. However it's not clear to me how