Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "056223".
Did you mean:
05622
2007 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] PointerType API Change
...hris
did mention that he would like passes to take address spaces into
account. Handling them properly is pretty trivial, I believe.
Take a look at the this exchange on LLVM commits for some background
discussion on this:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-
Mon-20071210/056223.html
--
Christopher Lamb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20071217/5b7df076/attachment.html>
2007 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] PointerType API Change
On Monday 17 December 2007, Christopher Lamb wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > Would it be possible to keep get() unchanged, with a default
> > behaviour, plus
> > a warning? Otherwise everybody (assuming everybody gets type void*)
> > will
> > have to update their LLVM passes, and either maintain two versions
> > of the
>