Displaying 20 results from an estimated 450 matches for "04am".
Did you mean:
03am
2016 Aug 29
4
encontrar fechas saltadas
?Hola,
"setdiff()" efectivamente funciona sobre vectores numéricos (no fechas).
Para fechas, es mejor hacerlo de esta forma (utilizando tus datos):
>
> Lines <- "fecha hora datos
+ 20/11/12 2:00:04AM 12.905
+ 21/11/12 3:00:04AM 12.889
+ 22/11/12 4:00:03AM 12.873
+ 23/11/12 5:00:03AM 12.861
+ 29/11/12 11:00:03AM 12.804
+ "
>
> datIn <- read.table(textConnection(Lines), header = TRUE, as.is = TRUE)
> datIn
fecha hora datos
1 20/11/12 2:00:04AM 12.905
2 21/11/12 3:0...
2019 Sep 04
2
CentOS 8 will be released soon?
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:04:04AM +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> I doubt that releasing CentOS 7.7 is a higher priority as many people are
> using CentOS 7,
...
I'm not quite sure how to parse that...
John
--
If the world were a village of 100 people ....
6 people (all in the USA) would own 59% of all the...
2016 Aug 30
2
encontrar fechas saltadas
...>
> ?Hola,
>
>
>
> "setdiff()" efectivamente funciona sobre vectores numéricos (no fechas).
>
> Para fechas, es mejor hacerlo de esta forma (utilizando tus datos):
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Lines <- "fecha hora datos
>
> + 20/11/12 2:00:04AM 12.905
>
> + 21/11/12 3:00:04AM 12.889
>
> + 22/11/12 4:00:03AM 12.873
>
> + 23/11/12 5:00:03AM 12.861
>
> + 29/11/12 11:00:03AM 12.804
>
> + "
>
> >
>
> > datIn <- read.table(textConnection(Lines), header = TRUE, as.is = TRUE)
>
> >...
2007 Sep 24
4
hvmloader not compiled
Hi,
when I compile xen 3.1.0 on Debian Etch, the hvmloader file is not compiled at all. I have bin86 and bcc but nothing appears.
I followed http://www.howtoforge.com/debian_etch_xen_3.1 and googled a lot without success.
In the meanwhile I just used a precompiled hvmloader. I think this is ok, but it is not the smart way :)
Any idea ?
2001 May 02
4
oops 2.2.19 ext3 0.0.6b prune_dcache
Hi,
i am seeing an oops (every couple of days) on a UP PII system with
SCSI disks, Kernel 2.2.19 and ext3 0.0.6b.
All oops output passed the klogd thus i cant anymore pipe it through
ksymoops - I ensured klogd got the correct System.map so the result
should be reliable.
Apr 25 17:03:10
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 8efd1fc8
current->tss.cr3 = 0981e000, %%cr3 =
2018 Feb 26
2
[RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Enable virtio_net to act as a backup for a passthru device
Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:59:04AM CET, stephen at networkplumber.org wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:30:12 -0800
>Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > Again, I undertand your motivation. Yet I don't like your solution.
>> > But if the decision is made to do this in-driver...
2018 Feb 26
2
[RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Enable virtio_net to act as a backup for a passthru device
Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:59:04AM CET, stephen at networkplumber.org wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:30:12 -0800
>Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > Again, I undertand your motivation. Yet I don't like your solution.
>> > But if the decision is made to do this in-driver...
2015 Aug 05
4
[PATCH net V2] virtio-net: drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST
virtio declares support for NETIF_F_FRAGLIST, but assumes
that there are at most MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2 fragments which isn't
always true with a fraglist.
A longer fraglist in the skb will make the call to skb_to_sgvec overflow
the sg array, leading to memory corruption.
Drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST so we only get what we can handle.
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason
2015 Aug 05
4
[PATCH net V2] virtio-net: drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST
virtio declares support for NETIF_F_FRAGLIST, but assumes
that there are at most MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2 fragments which isn't
always true with a fraglist.
A longer fraglist in the skb will make the call to skb_to_sgvec overflow
the sg array, leading to memory corruption.
Drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST so we only get what we can handle.
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason
2016 Aug 30
2
encontrar fechas saltadas
...>
> ?Hola,
>
>
>
> "setdiff()" efectivamente funciona sobre vectores numéricos (no fechas).
>
> Para fechas, es mejor hacerlo de esta forma (utilizando tus datos):
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Lines <- "fecha hora datos
>
> + 20/11/12 2:00:04AM 12.905
>
> + 21/11/12 3:00:04AM 12.889
>
> + 22/11/12 4:00:03AM 12.873
>
> + 23/11/12 5:00:03AM 12.861
>
> + 29/11/12 11:00:03AM 12.804
>
> + "
>
> >
>
> > datIn <- read.table(textConnection(Lines), header = TRUE, as.is = TRUE)
>
> >...
2009 Mar 25
11
ActiveRecord: Nested :include erroneous behavior
Hi,
Found a simple example breaking on moving to 2.2 from 2.0. This
example illustrates the usage of nested :include finder options.
class Book < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :distributors
end
class Distributor < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :book
has_many :agents
end
class Agent < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :distributor
has_many :shops
end
class Shop <
2018 Sep 04
3
gencache.tdb size and cache flush
Il 04/09/18 06:00, Volker Lendecke ha scritto:
> Hi!
>
> Technical description below, but the exec summary is: Yes, we have a
> performance problem with gencache.
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a midsize AD domain with some 50k users but only 100 workstations
>> joined.
>>
2013 Mar 08
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] TileGX, a new backend for Tilera's many core processor
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:13:04AM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote:
> The LLVM community prefers small, self-contained patches. Please split
> up your patches into small chunks that can be easily reviewed. Keep in
> mind that the compiler needs to work after each pass goes in. :-)
Just like with AArch64, this is not a reasonabl...
2016 Apr 05
1
[PATCH v4 3/6] smp: add function to execute a function synchronously on a cpu
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:04AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> +int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, bool pin, int (*func)(void *), void *par)
Why .pin and not .phys? .pin does not (to me) reflect the
hypervisor/physical-cpu thing.
Also, as per smp_call_function_single() would it not be more consistent
to make this the last...
2018 Nov 21
1
[PATCH v4 2/2] drm/virtio: add edid support
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:38:04AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 07:32:06AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > linux guest driver implementation of the VIRTIO_GPU_F_EDID feature.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
>
> Like with bochs, I think drm_do_get...
2019 May 27
1
[PATCH v7 0/7] Add virtio-iommu driver
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:31:59PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > OK this has been in next for a while.
> >
> > Last time IOMMU maintainers objected. Are objections
> > still in force?
> >
> > If not could we get acks pleas...
2020 Aug 10
1
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Fix pointer math in mlx5_vdpa_get_config()
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 06:34:04AM +0000, Eli Cohen wrote:
> Acked-by: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com>
>
> BTW, vdpa_sim has the same bug.
>
I sent a patch for that on April 6.
[PATCH 2/2] vdpa: Fix pointer math bug in vdpasim_get_config()
Jason acked the patch but it wasn't applied.
regards,
dan carpenter
2016 Apr 05
1
[PATCH v4 3/6] smp: add function to execute a function synchronously on a cpu
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:04AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> +int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, bool pin, int (*func)(void *), void *par)
Why .pin and not .phys? .pin does not (to me) reflect the
hypervisor/physical-cpu thing.
Also, as per smp_call_function_single() would it not be more consistent
to make this the last...
2018 Jan 10
2
1600x900 not available
I have no idea how.? All I can find is the Hi-DPi settings in
Gnome-Tweak but, of course, it only lets? me choose to scale from "1" to
"2" which makes things way too big.
On 01/10/2018 08:54 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
>> Is there a way I can add 1600x900 resolution the list of available
>> resolutions in settings-display?
> Bit of a generic answer, and
2019 Sep 04
2
CentOS 8 will be released soon?
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 11:07 AM Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 12:11:09PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:04:04AM +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> > > I doubt that releasing CentOS 7.7 is a higher priority as many people are
> > > using CentOS 7,
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I'm not quite sure how to parse that...
>
> I believe it is supposed to be:
>
> "...