search for: 04am

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 450 matches for "04am".

Did you mean: 03am
2016 Aug 29
4
encontrar fechas saltadas
?Hola, "setdiff()" efectivamente funciona sobre vectores numéricos (no fechas). Para fechas, es mejor hacerlo de esta forma (utilizando tus datos): > > Lines <- "fecha hora datos + 20/11/12 2:00:04AM 12.905 + 21/11/12 3:00:04AM 12.889 + 22/11/12 4:00:03AM 12.873 + 23/11/12 5:00:03AM 12.861 + 29/11/12 11:00:03AM 12.804 + " > > datIn <- read.table(textConnection(Lines), header = TRUE, as.is = TRUE) > datIn fecha hora datos 1 20/11/12 2:00:04AM 12.905 2 21/11/12 3:0...
2019 Sep 04
2
CentOS 8 will be released soon?
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:04:04AM +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > I doubt that releasing CentOS 7.7 is a higher priority as many people are > using CentOS 7, ... I'm not quite sure how to parse that... John -- If the world were a village of 100 people .... 6 people (all in the USA) would own 59% of all the...
2016 Aug 30
2
encontrar fechas saltadas
...> > ?Hola, > > > > "setdiff()" efectivamente funciona sobre vectores numéricos (no fechas). > > Para fechas, es mejor hacerlo de esta forma (utilizando tus datos): > > > > > > > > Lines <- "fecha hora datos > > + 20/11/12 2:00:04AM 12.905 > > + 21/11/12 3:00:04AM 12.889 > > + 22/11/12 4:00:03AM 12.873 > > + 23/11/12 5:00:03AM 12.861 > > + 29/11/12 11:00:03AM 12.804 > > + " > > > > > > datIn <- read.table(textConnection(Lines), header = TRUE, as.is = TRUE) > > >...
2007 Sep 24
4
hvmloader not compiled
Hi, when I compile xen 3.1.0 on Debian Etch, the hvmloader file is not compiled at all. I have bin86 and bcc but nothing appears. I followed http://www.howtoforge.com/debian_etch_xen_3.1 and googled a lot without success. In the meanwhile I just used a precompiled hvmloader. I think this is ok, but it is not the smart way :) Any idea ?
2001 May 02
4
oops 2.2.19 ext3 0.0.6b prune_dcache
Hi, i am seeing an oops (every couple of days) on a UP PII system with SCSI disks, Kernel 2.2.19 and ext3 0.0.6b. All oops output passed the klogd thus i cant anymore pipe it through ksymoops - I ensured klogd got the correct System.map so the result should be reliable. Apr 25 17:03:10 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 8efd1fc8 current->tss.cr3 = 0981e000, %%cr3 =
2018 Feb 26
2
[RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Enable virtio_net to act as a backup for a passthru device
Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:59:04AM CET, stephen at networkplumber.org wrote: >On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:30:12 -0800 >Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Again, I undertand your motivation. Yet I don't like your solution. >> > But if the decision is made to do this in-driver...
2018 Feb 26
2
[RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Enable virtio_net to act as a backup for a passthru device
Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:59:04AM CET, stephen at networkplumber.org wrote: >On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:30:12 -0800 >Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Again, I undertand your motivation. Yet I don't like your solution. >> > But if the decision is made to do this in-driver...
2015 Aug 05
4
[PATCH net V2] virtio-net: drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST
virtio declares support for NETIF_F_FRAGLIST, but assumes that there are at most MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2 fragments which isn't always true with a fraglist. A longer fraglist in the skb will make the call to skb_to_sgvec overflow the sg array, leading to memory corruption. Drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST so we only get what we can handle. Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jason
2015 Aug 05
4
[PATCH net V2] virtio-net: drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST
virtio declares support for NETIF_F_FRAGLIST, but assumes that there are at most MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2 fragments which isn't always true with a fraglist. A longer fraglist in the skb will make the call to skb_to_sgvec overflow the sg array, leading to memory corruption. Drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST so we only get what we can handle. Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jason
2016 Aug 30
2
encontrar fechas saltadas
...> > ?Hola, > > > > "setdiff()" efectivamente funciona sobre vectores numéricos (no fechas). > > Para fechas, es mejor hacerlo de esta forma (utilizando tus datos): > > > > > > > > Lines <- "fecha hora datos > > + 20/11/12 2:00:04AM 12.905 > > + 21/11/12 3:00:04AM 12.889 > > + 22/11/12 4:00:03AM 12.873 > > + 23/11/12 5:00:03AM 12.861 > > + 29/11/12 11:00:03AM 12.804 > > + " > > > > > > datIn <- read.table(textConnection(Lines), header = TRUE, as.is = TRUE) > > >...
2009 Mar 25
11
ActiveRecord: Nested :include erroneous behavior
Hi, Found a simple example breaking on moving to 2.2 from 2.0. This example illustrates the usage of nested :include finder options. class Book < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :distributors end class Distributor < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :book has_many :agents end class Agent < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :distributor has_many :shops end class Shop <
2018 Sep 04
3
gencache.tdb size and cache flush
Il 04/09/18 06:00, Volker Lendecke ha scritto: > Hi! > > Technical description below, but the exec summary is: Yes, we have a > performance problem with gencache. > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have a midsize AD domain with some 50k users but only 100 workstations >> joined. >>
2013 Mar 08
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] TileGX, a new backend for Tilera's many core processor
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:13:04AM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: > The LLVM community prefers small, self-contained patches. Please split > up your patches into small chunks that can be easily reviewed. Keep in > mind that the compiler needs to work after each pass goes in. :-) Just like with AArch64, this is not a reasonabl...
2016 Apr 05
1
[PATCH v4 3/6] smp: add function to execute a function synchronously on a cpu
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:04AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > +int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, bool pin, int (*func)(void *), void *par) Why .pin and not .phys? .pin does not (to me) reflect the hypervisor/physical-cpu thing. Also, as per smp_call_function_single() would it not be more consistent to make this the last...
2018 Nov 21
1
[PATCH v4 2/2] drm/virtio: add edid support
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:38:04AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 07:32:06AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > linux guest driver implementation of the VIRTIO_GPU_F_EDID feature. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> > > Like with bochs, I think drm_do_get...
2019 May 27
1
[PATCH v7 0/7] Add virtio-iommu driver
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:31:59PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > OK this has been in next for a while. > > > > Last time IOMMU maintainers objected. Are objections > > still in force? > > > > If not could we get acks pleas...
2020 Aug 10
1
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Fix pointer math in mlx5_vdpa_get_config()
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 06:34:04AM +0000, Eli Cohen wrote: > Acked-by: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> > > BTW, vdpa_sim has the same bug. > I sent a patch for that on April 6. [PATCH 2/2] vdpa: Fix pointer math bug in vdpasim_get_config() Jason acked the patch but it wasn't applied. regards, dan carpenter
2016 Apr 05
1
[PATCH v4 3/6] smp: add function to execute a function synchronously on a cpu
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:04AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > +int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, bool pin, int (*func)(void *), void *par) Why .pin and not .phys? .pin does not (to me) reflect the hypervisor/physical-cpu thing. Also, as per smp_call_function_single() would it not be more consistent to make this the last...
2018 Jan 10
2
1600x900 not available
I have no idea how.? All I can find is the Hi-DPi settings in Gnome-Tweak but, of course, it only lets? me choose to scale from "1" to "2" which makes things way too big. On 01/10/2018 08:54 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> Is there a way I can add 1600x900 resolution the list of available >> resolutions in settings-display? > Bit of a generic answer, and
2019 Sep 04
2
CentOS 8 will be released soon?
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 11:07 AM Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 12:11:09PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:04:04AM +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > > > I doubt that releasing CentOS 7.7 is a higher priority as many people are > > > using CentOS 7, > > > > ... > > > > I'm not quite sure how to parse that... > > I believe it is supposed to be: > > "...