search for: 045845

Hi folks (CCing llvm-dev, but that's probably more of a cfe-dev topic), As a follow-up to that old thread about -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=n http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-November/045845.html And, more recently, to this fedora thread where clang/llvm -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE support is claimed to be only partial: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2020 I dig into the glibc headers in order to have a better understanding of what's going on, and wrote my notes here: https://serge...

...[EXT] [cfe-dev] clang and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 > > > > Hi folks (CCing llvm-dev, but that's probably more of a cfe-dev topic), > > > > As a follow-up to that old thread about -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=n > > > > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-November/045845.html > > > > And, more recently, to this fedora thread where clang/llvm - > > D_FORTIFY_SOURCE > > support is claimed to be only partial: > > > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2020 > > > > I dig into the glibc headers in order to have a better und...