Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "04.07.19".
Did you mean:
03.07.19
2019 Jul 04
1
`samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix` fails: governsID already exists as an attributeId or governsId
On 04.07.19 15:54, Rowland penny via samba wrote:>> Still left are the
three governsId collisions, which are now identical
>> across all DCs:
>>
>>> Checking 3861 objects
>>> Error: governsID
>>> CN=ucsUser,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=tao,DC=at on
>>> 1.3.6.1.4.1.19414.3.2.2 already exists as an attributeId or governsId
>>>
2019 Jul 04
2
[PATCH 0/5] Unmappable DRM client buffers for fbdev emulation
Hi
Am 04.07.19 um 12:18 schrieb Noralf Tr?nnes:
>
>
> Den 04.07.2019 09.43, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 03.07.19 um 21:27 schrieb Noralf Tr?nnes:
>>>
>>>
>>> Den 03.07.2019 10.32, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>> DRM client buffers are permanently mapped throughout their lifetime. This
>>>> prevents us from
2019 Jul 04
2
[PATCH 0/5] Unmappable DRM client buffers for fbdev emulation
Hi
Am 04.07.19 um 12:18 schrieb Noralf Tr?nnes:
>
>
> Den 04.07.2019 09.43, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 03.07.19 um 21:27 schrieb Noralf Tr?nnes:
>>>
>>>
>>> Den 03.07.2019 10.32, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>> DRM client buffers are permanently mapped throughout their lifetime. This
>>>> prevents us from
2019 Jul 04
0
[PATCH 0/5] Unmappable DRM client buffers for fbdev emulation
Den 04.07.2019 13.10, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 04.07.19 um 12:18 schrieb Noralf Tr?nnes:
>>
>>
>> Den 04.07.2019 09.43, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 03.07.19 um 21:27 schrieb Noralf Tr?nnes:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Den 03.07.2019 10.32, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>> DRM
2019 Jul 04
2
`samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix` fails: governsID already exists as an attributeId or governsId
On 03.07.19 18:04, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>>>> How do I get rid of these bogus Schema entries, and how do I fix the
>>>> user account?
>>> I do not think you can remove anything from the schema, but I believe
>>> you can deactivate schema objects, try reading this:
>>>
>>>
2019 Jul 04
2
[PATCH 0/5] Unmappable DRM client buffers for fbdev emulation
Hi
Am 03.07.19 um 21:27 schrieb Noralf Tr?nnes:
>
>
> Den 03.07.2019 10.32, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
>> DRM client buffers are permanently mapped throughout their lifetime. This
>> prevents us from using generic framebuffer emulation for devices with
>> small dedicated video memory, such as ast or mgag200. With fb buffers
>> permanently mapped, such devices
2019 Jul 04
2
[PATCH 0/5] Unmappable DRM client buffers for fbdev emulation
Hi
Am 03.07.19 um 21:27 schrieb Noralf Tr?nnes:
>
>
> Den 03.07.2019 10.32, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
>> DRM client buffers are permanently mapped throughout their lifetime. This
>> prevents us from using generic framebuffer emulation for devices with
>> small dedicated video memory, such as ast or mgag200. With fb buffers
>> permanently mapped, such devices
2019 Jul 03
3
optimisation issue in an llvm IR pass
Hi Craig,
On 03.07.19 17:33, Craig Topper wrote:
> Don't the CreateICmp calls return a Value* with an i1 type? But then
> they are added to an i8 type? Not sure that works.
I had that initially:
auto cf = IRB.CreateICmpULT(Incr, ConstantInt::get(Int8Ty, 1));
auto carry = IRB.CreateZExt(cf, Int8Ty);
Incr = IRB.CreateAdd(Incr, carry);
it makes no difference to the generated assembly