search for: 036113

Hi, I have a problem that was reported some time ago but never received any solution. See http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-November/036113.html http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6981 JIT emitter for X86 aborts when is asked to emit instruction for opcode 11 (DBG_VALUE). That opcode comes from @llvm.dbg.declare intrinsic function. Should this intrinsic be removed in some earlier stage? -- Paweł Bylica

...is no action is surely that the old JIT implementation is being replaced with the new MCJIT implementation, so no-one feels very motivated to fix the old JIT since it is going away. Try passing -use-mcjit to lli. Ciao, Duncan. > See > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-November/036113.html > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6981 > > JIT emitter for X86 aborts when is asked to emit instruction for > opcode 11 (DBG_VALUE). > That opcode comes from @llvm.dbg.declare intrinsic function. > > Should this intrinsic be removed in some earlier stage? > > --...

...i32 0, i32* %a, align 4, !dbg !16 ret i32 0, !dbg !17 } The problem is with @llvm.dbg.declare which is the first instruction of the block. I reproduced the crash with lli on win32 and mingw32 but not on linux64. > >> See >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-November/036113.html >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6981 >> >> JIT emitter for X86 aborts when is asked to emit instruction for >> opcode 11 (DBG_VALUE). >> That opcode comes from @llvm.dbg.declare intrinsic function. >> >> Should this intrinsic be removed in some...