search for: 030s

...es? Also - I've noticed these reports seem very flaky on Windows. e.g. I often see 0 time reported for all of the instruction selection/scheduling, and of the time reported for the passes, it often displays times that are obviously a multiple of each other, e.g. one phase takes .045s, another .030s, and another 0.015s. Has anybody else noticed anything like this? I also see -track-memory reporting negative memory usage. Thanks, Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100724/5171f4c3/attac...

...t;AB8 at B'H6!TO '"7&1 -H=P,/)Z(W0@\$J&KW2 F6R3A2$HF!E)MB&E M;7F90<<=8NX[XYMXR>7;CB47!N,=A14Y5\G1U3;'' ,S^!852"0Q!6]/&$'% M%4%(400(4H, A11/6)$$$440 8(068 ]=9!5 'U$U* 8804PM]0DG#.>$ MV4$XD7816'Q=1%UP2>%9$DU P40298. M112]$T%XU.DF(030S!1!1&7'Y&B M$&Z#X,035,2&>!)4-$[%$RFNS77BBS?^>.1.3#ZX9U6#T$014 at R!A.1!")'$ MXE2DW;?91J#NQ.!3&P'W<%YG/?D053"1M==52 '%$U.PK34(G$^1>7B[$T'P MY:(_ 4(15A11.V^_,\&$VDBP[382SPNQ]>+!,[&U\W'K6]HXI[4A4,%R>TM" M 0]X.,R-S7U4&q...