search for: 030787

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "030787".

Did you mean: 0.0787
2011 May 02
1
[LLVMdev] status: llvm-stack-switch
Hello, I wanted to ask what the current status of llvm-stack-switch[1] is. Currently, we use uclib for implementing coroutines. The Problem with this is, that you either copy you stack (and invalidate pointers to lokals) or have many stacks on the heap (the is very memory inefficient). Having llvm doing some optimization there would really help. A different approach (for asymmetric coroutines)
2011 May 02
0
[LLVMdev] status: llvm-stack-switch
Hello Toralf, > I wanted to ask what the current status of llvm-stack-switch[1] is. Given that this project never appeared in this mailing list - have you tried to ask its author? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2011 May 04
0
[LLVMdev] exception cleanup examples (was: status: llvm-stack-switch)
...o ask what the current status of llvm-stack-switch[1] is. >> Given that this project never appeared in this mailing list - have you >> tried to ask its author? > >It is on the mailing list. This is how I found this project. >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-April/030787.html > >But I couldn't find any updates after this thread. > >Toralf Niebuhr I am trying to implement something like this using boost.context library; in my case, the scope of usage is more limited, in the sense that i don't want to spawn coroutines from the language, but actua...
2011 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: GSoC Project
This reminds me of Kenneth's "context" proposal from some time back: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-April/030787.html I haven't compared the two too closely, but I thought I should throw it out there as food for thought. Reid On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Justin Holewinski > <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrot...
2011 Apr 11
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: GSoC Project
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Justin Holewinski < justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Sanjoy Das < > sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for the feedback. For context, my implementation plan is here: >> http://pastebin.com/e9JMZNCE >> >> First, about unwinding: >>