search for: 03.11.20

> On 3 Nov 2020, at 19:24, Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 03.11.20 um 05:38 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel via samba: >> Hi, >> I have a Samba 4.11.8 system running as an AD and a file server and I am wondering what sort of ID mapping is done in this situation. >> >> I have uidNumber on each user set to use UIDs in the 1000 range

Hi, I have a Samba 4.11.8 system running as an AD and a file server and I am wondering what sort of ID mapping is done in this situation. I have uidNumber on each user set to use UIDs in the 1000 range but I find that they end up in the 3000000 range instead. Is this a fixable problem, or a result of having the file server and DC as the same machine? Thanks. -- Daniel O'Connor "The

Hi all, I know this isn't strictly Samba related, but I have a fileserver and want to install some VM software on it so I can build a new Samba DC on there and still keep the fileserver running. In your experience, what's the best VM to install? Are there any which wok better or worse with Samba? Does it make any difference? I'm running Ubuntu 20.04.1 Thanks!

On 03/11/2020 08:54, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > Am 03.11.20 um 05:38 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel via samba: >> Hi, >> I have a Samba 4.11.8 system running as an AD and a file server and I am wondering what sort of ID mapping is done in this situation. >> >> I have uidNumber on each user set to use UIDs in the 1000 range but I find that they end up in the

Am 03.11.20 um 17:46 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 03/11/2020 16:24, basti via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> is there a way to get the last uidNumber from ldap. >> >> I can do a ldapsearch like: >> >> ldapsearch -h samdom.example.com -D "administrator at samdom.example.com" >> -w "changeit"? -b

Hello, is there a way to get the last uidNumber from ldap. I can do a ldapsearch like: ldapsearch -h samdom.example.com -D "administrator at samdom.example.com" -w "changeit" -b "DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com" -x -LLL "(uidNumber=*)" uidNumber | grep -Po "(?<=uidNumber: )([0-9]{4})" | sort | tail -n1 But there is no guarantee that the last

Am 03.11.20 um 05:38 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel via samba: > Hi, > I have a Samba 4.11.8 system running as an AD and a file server and I am wondering what sort of ID mapping is done in this situation. > > I have uidNumber on each user set to use UIDs in the 1000 range but I find that they end up in the 3000000 range instead. > > Is this a fixable problem, or a result of

On 03/11/2020 12:05, O'Connor, Daniel via samba wrote: > >> On 3 Nov 2020, at 19:24, Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Am 03.11.20 um 05:38 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel via samba: >>> Hi, >>> I have a Samba 4.11.8 system running as an AD and a file server and I am wondering what sort of ID mapping is done in this situation.

> On 3 Nov 2020, at 19:55, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 03/11/2020 08:54, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> >> Am 03.11.20 um 05:38 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel via samba: >>> Hi, >>> I have a Samba 4.11.8 system running as an AD and a file server and I am wondering what sort of ID mapping is done in this situation.

Hi, the instructions for "Time Synchronisation - SELinux Labeling and Policy" on https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation_-_SELinux_Labeling_and_Policy don't seem to work on CentOS 8. Using chrony I tried to adapt them (with very limited SELinux knowledge) like this: chcon -u system_u -t chronyd_exec_t /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd semanage fcontext -a -t chronyd_exec_t