search for: 027370

....5/release/3.5.html <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.5/release/3.5.html>), and I don’t think there is anything really important to us in them. I am interested in a few things being discussed on the cmake-developers list though (http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/2016-January/027370.html <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/2016-January/027370.html>). It looks like that might make CMake 3.6, and it could be interesting for us. That said, this is likely a case where we could easily support the old and new versions without much problem and it doesn’t impac...

Most of the comments I have are actually very well captured by Chandler's email, so I'm not going to pile on. I do have a few things to add. Renato, in your most recent email you comment about differentiating *stable* vs random versions of CMake built from source. I believe as a community our recommendation should be that people download CMake sources from https://CMake.org/download/