search for: 024231

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "024231".

2016 Mar 15
2
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...sed through your syslinux archives and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possible. It would have been nice to rece...
2015 Jan 05
2
Fwd: [Cryptography] Why aren’t we using SSH for everything?
There were a few notes in this thread that may indicate open areas for development. I forward merely as FYI. http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-January/024231.html ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz> Date: Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Why aren?t we using SSH for everything? To: calestyo at scientia.net, pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz Cc: cryptography at metzdowd.com C...
2016 Mar 15
2
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...ves and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: > > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html > > > Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possible. > > > It wo...
2016 Mar 15
0
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...ves and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: > > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html > > > Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possible. > > > It wo...
2016 Mar 16
5
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...f an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: >> >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html >> >> >> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possible. >>...
2015 Jan 06
2
RE: Fwd: [Cryptography] Why aren’t we using SSH for everything?
...on mailing lists than write good software (cf. the sftp process). -d On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, grarpamp wrote: > There were a few notes in this thread that may indicate open areas for > development. I forward merely as FYI. > > http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-January/024231.htm > l > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz> > Date: Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM > Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Why aren?t we using SSH for everything? > To: calestyo at scientia.net, pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz...
2016 Mar 15
0
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...f an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: >> >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html >> >> >> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possible. >>...
2016 Mar 16
0
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...of the pxechn-module has come up several times: >>> >>> >>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html >>> >>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html >>> >>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html >>> >>> >>> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possib...