Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "024231".
2016 Mar 15
2
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...sed through your syslinux archives and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times:
http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html
http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html
http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html
Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possible.
It would have been nice to rece...
2015 Jan 05
2
Fwd: [Cryptography] Why aren’t we using SSH for everything?
There were a few notes in this thread that may indicate
open areas for development. I forward merely as FYI.
http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-January/024231.html
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Why aren?t we using SSH for everything?
To: calestyo at scientia.net, pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz
Cc: cryptography at metzdowd.com
C...
2016 Mar 15
2
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...ves and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times:
>
>
> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html
>
> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html
>
> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html
>
>
> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possible.
>
>
> It wo...
2016 Mar 15
0
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...ves and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times:
>
>
> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html
>
> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html
>
> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html
>
>
> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possible.
>
>
> It wo...
2016 Mar 16
5
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...f an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times:
>>
>>
>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html
>>
>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html
>>
>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html
>>
>>
>> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possible.
>>...
2015 Jan 06
2
RE: Fwd: [Cryptography] Why aren’t we using SSH for everything?
...on mailing lists than write good software (cf. the sftp process).
-d
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, grarpamp wrote:
> There were a few notes in this thread that may indicate open areas for
> development. I forward merely as FYI.
>
> http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-January/024231.htm
> l
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz>
> Date: Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Why aren?t we using SSH for everything?
> To: calestyo at scientia.net, pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz...
2016 Mar 15
0
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...f an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times:
>>
>>
>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html
>>
>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html
>>
>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html
>>
>>
>> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possible.
>>...
2016 Mar 16
0
Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module
...of the pxechn-module has come up several times:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html
>>>
>>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html
>>>
>>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of March 2015 gave positive indications that a general fix for com32-modules were possib...