search for: 022611

Hi, I have browsed through your syslinux archives and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems that Patricks update as of Marc...

...linux.0 to switch between the two system, but pxechn.c32 under Uefi come up with the folowing error "pxechn.c32: ERROR: Unable to retrieve first packet". I have seen that there was a message about this logged on the 28th August 2014 http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html, and I would like to know if there have been any updated on this problem. If I can help by doing some testing that would not be a problem, but I can not program. I probably could involve colleagues for in depth debugging or programming. Many thanks...

...2016 at 3:51 AM, Jan Frode J?ger <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I have browsed through your syslinux archives and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: > > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html > > > Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems...

...ch between the two > system, but pxechn.c32 under Uefi come up with the folowing error > "pxechn.c32: ERROR: Unable to retrieve first packet". I have seen > that there was a message about this logged on the 28th August 2014 http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html, > and I would like to know if there have been any updated on this > problem. > > > > > > If I can help by doing some testing that would not be a problem, but > I can not program. I probably could involve colleagues for in depth > de...

...2016 at 3:51 AM, Jan Frode J?ger <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I have browsed through your syslinux archives and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: > > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html > > > Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS and not UEFI. It also seems...

...?ger <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I have browsed through your syslinux archives and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: >> >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html >> >> >> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS...

...?ger <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I have browsed through your syslinux archives and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: >> >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html >> >> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html >> >> >> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to interface with legacy BIOS...

...om> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> I have browsed through your syslinux archives and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: >>> >>> >>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html >>> >>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html >>> >>> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html >>> >>> >>> Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module has been written to...