search for: 022590

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "022590".

Did you mean: 022510
2009 May 24
1
[LLVMdev] mixing static/dynamic code
...e instruction in the function but in the case where there is none (i.e. the argument is passed on directly to another function), creating a store does not help to get the memory address of the variable which takes me back to my initial question at http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-May/022590.html - isn't there a way to obtain the address of an argument? Because doing a store seems to copy the variable and expose the address of the copy - http://www.llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_store is not very clear on what's going on. You can imagine that if you try to do something like tain...
2009 May 24
0
[LLVMdev] mixing static/dynamic code
Paul Martin wrote: > > Nick, > Thanks for the quick answer. > Dereferencing the pointer does yield the same result in both cases but > that's not what I want to do. I want to instrument the program > dynamically and keep track of certain memory locations which is a > problem if the same variable has different addresses for the > static/dynamic code - as far I see
2009 May 24
2
[LLVMdev] mixing static/dynamic code
Nick, Thanks for the quick answer. Dereferencing the pointer does yield the same result in both cases but that's not what I want to do. I want to instrument the program dynamically and keep track of certain memory locations which is a problem if the same variable has different addresses for the static/dynamic code - as far I see this is what it's happening but I have no clue why. Paul On