Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "022590".
Did you mean:
022510
2009 May 24
1
[LLVMdev] mixing static/dynamic code
...e instruction in the function but
in the case where there is none (i.e. the argument is passed on directly to
another function), creating a store does not help to get the memory address
of the variable which takes me back to my initial question at
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-May/022590.html - isn't
there a way to obtain the address of an argument? Because doing a store
seems to copy the variable and expose the address of the copy -
http://www.llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_store is not very clear on what's
going on.
You can imagine that if you try to do something like tain...
2009 May 24
0
[LLVMdev] mixing static/dynamic code
Paul Martin wrote:
>
> Nick,
> Thanks for the quick answer.
> Dereferencing the pointer does yield the same result in both cases but
> that's not what I want to do. I want to instrument the program
> dynamically and keep track of certain memory locations which is a
> problem if the same variable has different addresses for the
> static/dynamic code - as far I see
2009 May 24
2
[LLVMdev] mixing static/dynamic code
Nick,
Thanks for the quick answer.
Dereferencing the pointer does yield the same result in both cases but
that's not what I want to do. I want to instrument the program dynamically
and keep track of certain memory locations which is a problem if the same
variable has different addresses for the static/dynamic code - as far I see
this is what it's happening but I have no clue why.
Paul
On