search for: 01a71a05

...Finally, I would focus on "user facing" FAQs for the quick 10 questions. I don't think developers will really be helped by these as often. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120613/01a71a05/attachment.html>

I think the best way that I can currently contribute to the project is through technical writing. So I see myself as doing a serious, long-term project of extending the FAQ. So, I can affirm that I want to really start working :) This at the same time as I plan to regularly release an unofficial Windows distro of Clang with headers and libraries so people don't need to install MinGW to use

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Guys, that was very interesting and useful stuff you preached there. Mind > if I make a patch to the FAQ and include it somewhere? > > "Q: When should I develop against a branch? A: Only if you are making > really big or controversial changes. ... blah blah > > I am thinking that it