Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "016371".
Did you mean:
16371
2018 Dec 20
3
[RFC] Matrix support (take 2)
...eed to be addressed, but it's an
interesting idea to consider. I wasn't too hot on it at the time but it
may be a way forward.
In that thread, Tim Foley posted a summary of options for mask support,
one of which was adding intrinsics:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2008-August/016371.html
-David
2018 Dec 19
3
[RFC] Matrix support (take 2)
Adam Nemet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
> I spent some time chatting with Adam about this and have a better
> understanding of his concerns here. It seems to me that if having
> masking intrinsics is the long-term solution we want, we should do
> that now (for add and sub) rather than building arbitrary matrix
> layout info into