Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0158029c".
Did you mean:
015029
2009 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] PR5373
Hello,
Simply removing that "return true" causes the code to search
blocks outside of loops for side effects. That's not
what the code is supposed to do.
Dan
On Nov 27, 2009, at 3:01 AM, Jakub Staszak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Because of this "return true" not every block was visited and only one ExitBB was found (instead of two). Thus, loop was optimized as a trivial
2009 Nov 27
2
[LLVMdev] PR5373
Hi,
Because of this "return true" not every block was visited and only one
ExitBB was found (instead of two). Thus, loop was optimized as a
trivial one, which was wrong.
-Jakub
On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Dan Gohman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I haven't studied this in detail, but at a first look this makes the
> code inconsistent with the associated comments. Why
2009 Dec 06
1
[LLVMdev] PR5373
...d it out :)
Dan, can you look at this patch?
Thanks
-Jakub
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pr5373-2.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1672 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091206/0158029c/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:52 PM, Dan Gohman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Simply removing that "return true" causes the code to search
> blocks outside of loops for side effects. That's not
> what the code is supposed to d...