search for: 014656

...rote: > Would it be possible to use CityHash instead for strings? > > http://code.google.com/p/cityhash/ Incidentally there was talk of using CityHash for LLVM's StringMap last year, but I don't think it ever came to anything: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2011-April/014656.html Jay.

...at 0x00007fe240 on channel 0x0000fee0 [unknown] BAR/PFIFO_WRITE/FB reason: PAGE_NOT_PRESENT kernel: nouveau E[ PFB][0000:01:00.0] trapped write at 0x00007fe400 on channel 0x0000fee0 [unknown] BAR/PFIFO_WRITE/FB reason: PAGE_NOT_PRESENT http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2013-October/014656.html --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c index b035317..3fa6628 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c +++ b/driver...

Hello, I currently use procmail without the deliver LDA but would like to switch to using deliver. I also would like to get away from procmail for various reasons. Otherwise I could use the procmail-patch from http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2006-July/014656.html AFAICS. I don't want to use sieve because it's too limited and can't see a similar patch like the one for procmail available for maildrop. What setup would I use for Postfix+maildrop+deliver? thanks, Tom

...use CityHash instead for strings? >> >> http://code.google.com/p/cityhash/ > > Incidentally there was talk of using CityHash for LLVM's StringMap > last year, but I don't think it ever came to anything: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2011-April/014656.html At that point, there wasn't a clear win. CityHash (iirc) is optimized for huge strings, which aren't the usual case in the compiler AFAIK. -Chris

...on channel 0x0000fee0 [unknown] BAR/PFIFO_WRITE/FB reason: PAGE_NOT_PRESENT > kernel: nouveau E[ PFB][0000:01:00.0] trapped write at 0x00007fe400 on channel 0x0000fee0 [unknown] BAR/PFIFO_WRITE/FB reason: PAGE_NOT_PRESENT > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2013-October/014656.html > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) <formletter> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to...

...move the line and 3) add it's own using the formally extracted sender address? This sounds best for me and would cover the problem most effective... BTW: I've found the "dovecot deliver patch for procmail" and it looks really good (http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2006-July/014656.html), but it seems to me, that the "From " line problem is solved by optionally removing the whole line, so deliver would use it's own default "From MAILER-DAEMON "-line ... and this in fact the problem Regards, Ralf -- __________________________________________________...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62835 Priority: medium Bug ID: 62835 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Screen freezes after resume from s2ram QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: pontus.fuchs at gmail.com

...SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Giving up on the sieve plugin and switching to procmail. I found the following link: http://wiki.dovecot.org/procmail This site doesn't saying anything about needing to modify the procmail source code like here: http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2006-July/014656.html Thos shows how to make procmail work with dovecot deliver program. So you create the following /etc/procmailrc file: # file: /etc/procmailrc # system-wide settings for procmail SHELL="/usr/bin/sh" SENDMAIL="/userM/mail-services/postfix/lib/sendmail" LOGFILE="/var/lo...

Hi, I have site w. around 7000 users, most of which have some procmail rules (theres even .procmailrc in /etc/skel with rule to put spam into spam folder). Afaik dovecot's deliver doesnt understand procmail rules, so i'd like to ask if its possible to configure procmail so it saves mail using deliver, without modifying users .procmailrc Thanks for any pointers, Vaclav Hula

...0x0000fee0 [unknown] BAR/PFIFO_WRITE/FB reason: PAGE_NOT_PRESENT >> kernel: nouveau E[ PFB][0000:01:00.0] trapped write at 0x00007fe400 on channel 0x0000fee0 [unknown] BAR/PFIFO_WRITE/FB reason: PAGE_NOT_PRESENT >> >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2013-October/014656.html >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 8 ++++---- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > <formletter> > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > stable kernel tree. Please read Documentati...

Hi all... How can deliver messages to a subfolder using the LDA? For example, I want a message to joe+spam at abc.com to be placed inside the 'spam' subfolder. Any hint is appreciated. Thanks ;)

On 13 February 2012 00:59, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Here's my latest version of Hashing.h, which I propose to add to llvm/ADT. > Comments welcome and encouraged. > /// Adapted from MurmurHash2 by Austin Appleby Just out of curiosity, why not MurmurHash3 ? This page seems to suggest that #2 has some flaw, and #3 is better all round:

(Using dovecot 1.0 RC7 on Fedora Core 5) <scene set> Hitherto we have used UW-IMAP on a "farm" of Linux machines mounting NFS from a NetApp. (The UW-IMAP author doesn't like use of NFS, but with careful use of NFS mount arguments ('noac,actimeo=0' etc.) and trying to ensure that all activity for a given user takes place within one machine in the farm, we seem to

Hi, I''ve read the documentation about HTB and I pretty much managed to grasp how it works. In theory. But there still are some questions and I want to check with you to see if I understand things correctly. So here goes: 1) when used on a router for shaping traffic done by clients connected to it, shaping is done on the interface connected to the cable/dsl modem. If I wanted to create

Here's my latest version of Hashing.h, which I propose to add to llvm/ADT. Comments welcome and encouraged. On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, the reason I'm bringing this up is that a number of folks are > currently working on optimizing the use of hash tables within LLVM's code > base, and unless we can come up with a

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58556 Priority: medium Bug ID: 58556 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: MacBook Pro 5,1 with nVidia 9400m and 9600m, scrambled screen QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: other