search for: 012345678

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "012345678".

Did you mean: 01234567g
2009 Aug 28
5
Finding data which, when tweaked, matches.
Say I have a string : "012345678". I have a column in a table which also stores strings. I want to find all rows which match that string of numbers in that order. That is, "012345678" will match, but "012-34-5678" will, and "012sneeze345bless67you8thanks" also will. Do I have to do something lik...
2014 Sep 19
0
vsnprintf_s and vsnprintf
...use vnsprintf? > > Ok, we need to drop vsnprintf_s to support WinXP. I'd prefer vsnprintf > over vsprintf but have no way of testing any of these options. I wrote a small program that fills a buffer[] with "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz\0" pattern and then tries to write "0123456789" string into it. It calls either ret = vsnprintf_s(buffer, buf_size, _TRUNCATE, fmt, va); or ret = vsnprintf(buffer, buf_size, fmt, va); The results are: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- vsnprintf_s (MSVC, MinGW): buf_size = 8; ret...
2016 Feb 03
3
Re: [PATCH 1/3] launch: add internal helper for socket paths creation
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 19:47:12 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 03:27:39PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > diff --git a/src/launch.c b/src/launch.c > > index f59818f..ec061e3 100644 > > --- a/src/launch.c > > +++ b/src/launch.c > > @@ -418,6 +418,21 @@ guestfs_int_get_cpu_model (int kvm) > > #endif > > } > > > >
2014 Sep 18
3
patch for win_utf8_io.c: vsnprintf_s vs. MinGW
lvqcl wrote: > Oops. It seems that vsnprintf_s isn't always available on MinGW platform: > MinGW declares this function only if MINGW_HAS_SECURE_API macro is defined. > That's because WinXP version of msvcrt.dll doesn't contain secure functions > like vsnprintf_s. > > Maybe it's better to revert vsnprintf_s to vsprintf or to use vnsprintf? Ok, we need to drop
2016 Jun 04
6
Including doesn't have any effect
Hi list, n00b question, but I can't figure it out: [callthrough] exten => _+X.,1,NoOp(nothing here) #include "blockedall.conf" exten => _+X.,n(hangup),Hangup exten => _+X.,n(nohangup),GotoIf($["${CALLERID(num)}" = "anonymous"]?nocli:cli) ... more stuff that is handling the call ... I'm putting CLIs that I don't want to be able to call my
2016 Feb 03
0
Re: [PATCH 1/3] launch: add internal helper for socket paths creation
...ger than UNIX_PATH_MAX, then > *sockpath won't be 0-terminated. That's not true though: --------------------------------------------------------- test.c ----- #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main () { char s[10]; snprintf (s, sizeof s, "%s", "0123456789"); printf ("s = %s\n", s); return 0; } ---------------------------------------------------------------------- $ gcc -Wall test.c -o test $ ./test s = 012345678 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virt...
2002 May 27
0
[Bug 258] New: scanf format not portable
...sh.c.orig Tue Apr 23 04:09:46 2002 +++ ssh.c Sun May 26 19:48:49 2002 @@ -467,9 +467,9 @@ case 'L': case 'R': - if (sscanf(optarg, "%5[0-9]:%255[^:]:%5[0-9]", + if (sscanf(optarg, "%5[0123456789]:%255[^:]:%5[012345678 9]", sfwd_port, buf, sfwd_host_port) != 3 && - sscanf(optarg, "%5[0-9]/%255[^/]/%5[0-9]", + sscanf(optarg, "%5[0123456789]/%255[^/]/%5[0123456789]",...
2016 Jun 04
2
Including doesn't have any effect
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016, Frank Vanoni wrote: > Another possible approach to blacklist two (or more) specific callers > (098765432 and 012345678 as example) > > exten => _+x.,1,Gosub(blacklist,s,1) > exten => _+x.,n,.... > exten => black,1,playback(tt-monkeys) > > In blacklist.conf > > exten => s/098765432,1,Goto(black,1) > exten => s/012345678,1,Goto(black,1) Using a 'goto' to exit from a...
2010 Sep 16
4
[OT-FreePBX] Outbound calls check inbound routes to see if destination is local?
Greetings- First, my apologies for the OT post. Yes, I understand this is not the FreePBX-users mailing list. But, there are a large number of people that use FreePBX and I'm hoping they can be of assistance. I have a system running Asterisk 1.4.27 (see... relevance!!!) and FreePBX 2.6.0. There are a large number of inbound routes configured for the various DID's coming in via PRI, SIP,