search for: 012126

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "012126".

Did you mean: 12126
2020 Nov 01
3
ups.test.result meaning
...y requires making some changes deep in the core USB HID code (that would require a lot of testing on other vendors' equipment) for what is basically a cosmetic issue: > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/439 https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2020-October/012126.html
2020 Nov 01
0
ups.test.result meaning
...some changes deep in the core USB HID code (that would require a lot of testing on other vendors' equipment) for what is basically a cosmetic issue: >> >> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/439 > > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2020-October/012126.html >
2011 Jul 04
0
rgdal 0.7-1 release
...rgdal, a package providing bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library for reading and writing spatial data, has reached CRAN. This release changes the error handling mechanisms, and is more fully described in a posting on R-sig-geo: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/2011-July/012126.html If any users observe unexpected behaviour following update, please revert to the 0.6-* series, and report with full details to the package maintainer. Extensive checking has been carried out, and no unexpected behaviour observed, but it is not feasible to check all possible use cases, esp...
2011 Jul 04
0
rgdal 0.7-1 release
...rgdal, a package providing bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library for reading and writing spatial data, has reached CRAN. This release changes the error handling mechanisms, and is more fully described in a posting on R-sig-geo: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/2011-July/012126.html If any users observe unexpected behaviour following update, please revert to the 0.6-* series, and report with full details to the package maintainer. Extensive checking has been carried out, and no unexpected behaviour observed, but it is not feasible to check all possible use cases, esp...
2020 Nov 01
4
ups.test.result meaning
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 2:42 PM Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote: > I'm going to guess that since your test runtime of 305 is very close to > the low limit of 300, that's the warning. Not yet a fail, but very, very > close. > I tried setting override.battery.runtime.low = 60 in ups.conf, and waited for the UPS to reach 100% charge, and ups.status to report only