Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "01107940".
2009 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release1 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
The sources weren't updated for this pre-release testing. So I had the
same problems on PPC.
-bw
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Tanya Lattner<lattner at apple.com> wrote:
> LLVMers,
> 2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community.
> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
> You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of both
> clang
2009 Sep 03
2
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release1 ready for testing
...c foo.c
77C42A16 (0x0022F958 0x0167C757 0x0022F988 0x0167CBE8), wscanf()+1872
bytes(s)
77C3F962 (0x0022F9B0 0x0167C757 0x0167CBE8 0xFFFFFFFF), sprintf()+0049
bytes(s)
0046DA0C (0x10202000 0x20101010 0x20202020 0x60404020)
01AED7D4 (0x015B9F80 0x015B8590 0x015B9070 0x0081BC20) <unknown module>
01107940 (0x95340800 0x24048901 0x71ECFBE8 0x0CC483FF)
C7102444 (0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000) <unknown module>
clang: error: compiler command failed due to signal 1073741819 (use -v to
see invocation)
A debug build fails on the same problem :
./Debug/bin/clang foo.c
Stack dump:
0....
2009 Aug 31
10
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release1 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release1 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
You will notice that we have quite a few pre-compiled binaries (of
both clang and llvm-gcc). We have identified several bugs that will be
fixed in pre-release2, so please search the bug database before filing
a new bug.
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the