search for: 00cc

...", 15, 0, 0x33f9a4 trace:font:get_glyph_index 0421 (ffffffd1) -> ret 178 def_used 0 trace:font:WineEngGetGlyphOutline 0x1ee2f18, 00b2, 00000080, 0x33ef8c, 00000000, (nil), (nil) trace:font:get_glyph_index 043b (ffffffeb) -> ret 204 def_used 0 trace:font:WineEngGetGlyphOutline 0x1ee2f18, 00cc, 00000080, 0x33ef8c, 00000000, (nil), (nil) trace:font:get_glyph_index 0443 (fffffff3) -> ret 212 def_used 0 trace:font:WineEngGetGlyphOutline 0x1ee2f18, 00d4, 00000080, 0x33ef8c, 00000000, (nil), (nil) trace:font:get_glyph_index 0436 (ffffffe6) -> ret 199 def_used 0 trace:font:WineEngGetGlyp...

...ching row to transform err:msi:ACTION_CallDllFunction Custom action (L"C:\\windows\\temp\\msia2f2.tmp":L"OfficeDataLockPermissions") caused a page fault: c0000005 err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x7e5e6ef8 "handle.c: MSI_object_cs" wait timed out in thread 00cc, blocked by 0059, retrying (60 sec) fixme:hook:IsWinEventHookInstalled (32773)-stub! fixme:ntdll:NtPowerInformation Unimplemented NtPowerInformation action: 16 ....... I have tried all the guides I can find so far. any tips on things I could try to resolve this 2/3rd way install issue?

...000B,000C,000D,000E,000F,0010,0011,0013,0017,0018,0019,001A,001C,0020,0021,0022,0023,0024,0025,0026,0027,0028,0029,002B,002C,002D,002E,002F,0030,0031,0034,0036,0037,0038,0039,003A,003B,003D,0064,0068,006A,0071,0078,007A,007C,0080,0083,0089,008D,0097,00C0,00C1,00C2,00C3,00C4,00C5,00C6,00C7,00C8,00CA,00CC,00CD,00E1,00E8,0105,0106,0107,0108,010D#012' [447] Que signifie-t-il ? Qu'est ce "x86cpu:vendor:0002:family:0014:model:0002:feature" ? Une id?e ? Slts -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-...

I've upgraded my system at Samba 3.0.20 (SLES 8) bacause of some errors on winbind and Windows 2003. Now, usrmgr.exe doesn't work anymore. It reports: ?procedure number is out of range - Do you want to administrate another domain?? USRMGR has been working for 3 years; I've made all upgrades on Windows 2000, but the results it's the same. Any Idea? uz.

...0 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved) (XEN) 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) (XEN) 00000000ff000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) (XEN) 0000000100000000 - 0000000230000000 (usable) (XEN) System RAM: 8190MB (8387120kB) (XEN) ACPI: RSDP 000F6530, 0024 (r2 PTLTD ) (XEN) ACPI: XSDT CFEFA758, 00CC (r1 SMCSLP SUPERMIC 6040000 LTP 0) (XEN) ACPI: FACP CFF022FC, 00F4 (r3 INTEL STOAKLEY 6040000 PTL 3) (XEN) ACPI: DSDT CFEFD9BC, 48CC (r1 Intel SEABURG 6040000 MSFT 3000001) (XEN) ACPI: FACS CFF03FC0, 0040 (XEN) ACPI: DMAR CFF023F0, 0108 (r1 Intel OEMDMAR 6040000 LOHR 1) (XEN) ACPI: TCPA C...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96737 Bug ID: 96737 Summary: G98: LightDM 1 : 0 Nouveau Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: All OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

...00c0 unkown: 00000000 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00c4 unkown: 00000000 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00c8 num_other_sids: 00000002 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00cc buffer_other_sids: 0002001c [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00d0 uni_max_len: 00000007 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00d4 offset : 00000000 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642...

...(r2 INTEL) (XEN) ACPI: XSDT AF7FDE18, 0074 (r1 INTEL IVB-PPT 6222004 MSFT 10013) (XEN) ACPI: FACP AF7E3D98, 00F4 (r4 INTEL IVB-PPT 6222004 MSFT 10013) (XEN) ACPI: DSDT AF7C3018, F800 (r2 INTEL IVB-PPT 0 INTL 20110623) (XEN) ACPI: FACS AF7F9E40, 0040 (XEN) ACPI: APIC AF7FCF18, 00CC (r2 INTEL IVB-PPT 6222004 MSFT 10013) (XEN) ACPI: HPET AF7F8F18, 0038 (r1 A M I PCHHPET 6222004 AMI. 3) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT AF7E5018, 10A8 (r1 TrmRef PtidDevc 1000 INTL 20110623) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT AF7E4918, 0411 (r1 AMI PerfTune 1000 INTL 20110623) (XEN) ACPI: MCFG AF7F8E98,...

...0000ae smb_io_unistr2 sharename 00b0 uni_max_len: 00000005 00b4 offset : 00000000 00b8 uni_str_len: 00000005 00bc buffer : 0000c6 smb_io_unistr2 portname 00c8 uni_max_len: 00000013 00cc offset : 00000000 00d0 uni_str_len: 00000013 00d4 buffer : 0000fa smb_io_unistr2 drivername 00fc uni_max_len: 00000011 0100 offset : 00000000 0104 uni_str_len: 00000011 0108 buff...

...00c0 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00c4 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00c8 num_other_sids: 00000001 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00cc buffer_other_sids: 00144194 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00d0 uni_max_len: 00000008 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00d4 offset : 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710)...

...00c0 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00c4 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00c8 num_other_sids: 00000001 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00cc buffer_other_sids: 00144194 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00d0 uni_max_len: 00000008 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00d4 offset : 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710)...

...uint32(704) > 00c4 uni_max_len: 00000003 >[2006/08/27 20:03:03, 5, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(704) > 00c8 offset : 00000000 >[2006/08/27 20:03:03, 5, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(704) > 00cc uni_str_len: 00000003 >[2006/08/27 20:03:03, 5, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(936) > 00d0 buffer : l.a.w. >[2006/08/27 20:03:03, 9, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(84) > 0000d6 smb_io_unistr2 uni_wksta_name >[200...

...rse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(704) 00c4 uni_max_len: 00000003 [2006/08/27 20:03:03, 5, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(704) 00c8 offset : 00000000 [2006/08/27 20:03:03, 5, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(704) 00cc uni_str_len: 00000003 [2006/08/27 20:03:03, 5, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(936) 00d0 buffer : l.a.w. [2006/08/27 20:03:03, 9, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(84) 0000d6 smb_io_unistr2 uni_wksta_name [2006/08/27 20:03:03, 5,...

...n: 0000000b 00a4 offset : 00000000 00a8 uni_str_len: 0000000b 00ac buffer : U.N.I.D.R.V...D.L.L... 0000c2 smb_io_unistr2 datafile 00c4 uni_max_len: 0000000c 00c8 offset : 00000000 00cc uni_str_len: 0000000c 00d0 buffer : C.N.L.B.P.4.U...G.P.D... 0000e8 smb_io_unistr2 configfile 00e8 uni_max_len: 0000000d 00ec offset : 00000000 00f0 uni_str_len: 0000000d 00f4 buffer : U.N.I.D.R....

We have an Exchange 5.5 server in our Samba 3 domain und want to have POP3 access with clear text authentication from clients. But no kind of credentials is accepted. It did a level 10 log on the Samba server and found my clear text password in the log (in nt_chal_resp and lm_chal_resp fields) during authentication. Is it possible that Samba can't handle the clear-text pass-through from

.../parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) > 00c4 uni_max_len: 00000008 > [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) > 00c8 offset : 00000000 > [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) > 00cc uni_str_len: 00000008 > [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(807) > 00d0 buffer : h.e.n.r.i.q.u.e. > [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 9] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82) > 0000e0 smb_io_unistr2 unistr2 > [2004/06/21 15:27:1...

...0080 buffer : \.\.L.O.C.A.L.H.O.S.T... 0098 uni_max_len: 00000011 009c offset : 00000000 00a0 uni_str_len: 00000011 00a4 buffer : \.\.L.O.C.A.L.H.O.S.T.\.t.e.s.t... 00c8 uni_max_len: 00000005 00cc offset : 00000000 00d0 uni_str_len: 00000005 00d4 buffer : t.e.s.t... 00e0 uni_max_len: 00000013 00e4 offset : 00000000 00e8 uni_str_len: 00000013 00ec buffer : S.a.m.b.a. .P.r.i.n.t.e.r....

...21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) 00c4 uni_max_len: 00000008 [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) 00c8 offset : 00000000 [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) 00cc uni_str_len: 00000008 [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(807) 00d0 buffer : h.e.n.r.i.q.u.e. [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 9] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82) 0000e0 smb_io_unistr2 unistr2 [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs...

...er_rid: 00000870 [2007/02/17 16:28:04, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) 00c4 group_rid: 00000201 [2007/02/17 16:28:04, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) 00c8 group_count: 00000010 [2007/02/17 16:28:04, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) 00cc group_mem_ptr: 0002001c [2007/02/17 16:28:04, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) 00d0 user_flags: 00000020 [2007/02/17 16:28:04, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) 00d4 reserved13.0: 00000000 [2007/02/17 16:28:04, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642)...

....8..........a.n 0x0020: 8010 0113 f1b8 0000 0101 080a 0052 eaaf .............R.. 0x0030: 0052 eaa4 .R.. (***) 17:18:50.417288 IP 192.168.56.33.53237 > 192.168.56.32.88: v5 0x0000: 4500 00e0 a65e 4000 4011 a21c c0a8 3821 E....^@. at .....8! 0x0010: c0a8 3820 cff5 0058 00cc f26f 6a81 c130 ..8....X...oj..0 0x0020: 81be a103 0201 05a2 0302 010a a30e 300c ..............0. 0x0030: 300a a104 0202 0095 a202 0400 a481 a130 0..............0 0x0040: 819e a007 0305 0000 0000 10a1 2b30 29a0 ............+0). 0x0050: 0302 0101 a122 3020 1b04 686f 7374 1b18...