Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "00bedaba".
2012 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
Hi Duncan,
Sorry I don't understand your point, could you please explain a little bit more?
Why i1 should be declared illegal? Operations on byte-wide types like
char or bool are pretty legal, according to PTX spec:
"Registers may be typed (signed integer, unsigned integer, floating
point, predicate) or untyped. Register size is restricted; aside from
predicate registers which are
2012 Jun 30
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
Hi Dmitry,
>> did you declare i1 to be an illegal type?
>
> No. How?
I think it will be considered illegal if you don't add it to any
register class.
Ciao, Duncan.
>
> 2012/6/30 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>> So instead of setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand); one
>>> should probably do
2012 Jul 02
4
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...gt; LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
--
Thanks,
Justin Holewinski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120702/00bedaba/attachment.html>