search for: 00bedaba

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "00bedaba".

2012 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
Hi Duncan, Sorry I don't understand your point, could you please explain a little bit more? Why i1 should be declared illegal? Operations on byte-wide types like char or bool are pretty legal, according to PTX spec: "Registers may be typed (signed integer, unsigned integer, floating point, predicate) or untyped. Register size is restricted; aside from predicate registers which are
2012 Jun 30
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
Hi Dmitry, >> did you declare i1 to be an illegal type? > > No. How? I think it will be considered illegal if you don't add it to any register class. Ciao, Duncan. > > 2012/6/30 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>: >> Hi Dmitry, >>> So instead of setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand); one >>> should probably do
2012 Jul 02
4
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...gt; LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -- Thanks, Justin Holewinski -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120702/00bedaba/attachment.html>