Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "008847".
Did you mean:
008843
2015 May 24
2
CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
It looks like the culprit is IPv6 according to a post on the CentOS
Mirrors mailing list
(http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/2015-May/008847.html):
> Hello,
>
> mirrorlist.centos.org currently doesn't correctly answer on IPv6 -
> The request succeeds superficially (200 OK), but the answer is
> empty:
>
> ~ $ curl -6
> "http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=6&arch=x86_64&repo=os" ~ $
>...
2015 May 24
0
CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out
Am 24.05.2015 um 16:54 schrieb Tim Semeijn:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It looks like the culprit is IPv6 according to a post on the CentOS
> Mirrors mailing list
> (http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/2015-May/008847.html):
Bingo.
[root at msg ~]# curl -6
"http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=6&arch=x86_64&repo=os"; echo $?
0
[root at msg ~]# curl -4
"http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=6&arch=x86_64&repo=os"; echo $?
http://ftp.wrz.de/pub/CentOS/6.6/os/x86_64/
ftp://m...
2015 May 24
2
CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out
Am 24.05.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
> On 05/24/2015 07:48 AM, Tim Semeijn wrote:
>> Weird, as all CentOS machines under my control are suddenly giving the
>> baseurl of Base repo not found error since this morning. Could be that
>> mirrorlist is leading but all other options I found online to debug
>> the error message seem to indicate that (un)commenting