search for: 00500

...ults with this error text. Can someone tell, what causes the error? > error: Failed to attach disk error: operation failed: adding scsi > disk controller failed: type scsi not a hotpluggable PCI device. > failed to add if=scsi - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Suvilahdenkatu 1 B 78 * 00500 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi at greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi

...d That command syntax is probably ot right yet, but the main question is, where is qemu? I was tempted to yum-install qemu from rpmforge, but I would rather not. Besides the rpmforge version has a conflict with another manual page. - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Suvilahdenkatu 1 B 78 * 00500 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi at greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi

...attached successfully I have not seen any mention anywhere about using virtio drivers like this. And the problem with this is that the new disk does not survive guest reboot. At guest startup virsh complains about the virtio drivers. - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Suvilahdenkatu 1 B 78 * 00500 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi at greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi

[ -netters, please Cc me or security@ with replies. ] I'm running into trouble integrating dynamic racoon-based IPSec into a network with ipfw and natd. I need to be able to allow VPN access from any address from authenticated clients. I've got the dynamic VPN working, with racoon negotiating SAs and installing SPs, but the problem is that I can't tell whether an incoming packet on

In my recent security email, I got the following errors: cantona.dnswatchdog.com login failures: Aug 20 02:37:19 cantona sshd[9444]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted Aug 20 04:30:42 cantona sshd[16142]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted Aug 20 21:21:51 cantona sshd[45716]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted So three questions: What is it? Should I be worried?

Hi There, I've been having an issue trying to figure out a way to policy route outbound packets from a multihomed machine through the proper interface using IPFW to no avail. I've tried several different incantations of IPFW fwd/forward statements, and none of them seem to do the trick. Basically, I have a host that has multiple Internet connections. This host is running FreeBSD 4.9

...g ns queries (specifically, queries which result with no answer) regarding one domain (for which my ns is authoritative). Is this possible? I know you can turn on logging "globally" using the logging section of named.conf. - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Suvilahdenkatu 1 B 78 * 00500 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi at greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi

...for this installation? | > | [*] vda 0 MB (Unknown) ^ | > | And if I now try to create partitions, I get "no space" error. What is going on?? Cheers to CentOS! - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Suvilahdenkatu 1 B 78 * 00500 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi at greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi

...nger 20 A) 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Work telephone: +358 9 19129312 (int'l) 09-19129312 (in Finland) Work telefax: +358 9 19129307 (int'l) 09-19129307 (in Finland) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Private address: Fleminginkatu 25 E 91, 00500 Helsinki, Finland Private telephone: +358 50 5909015 (int'l) 050-5909015 (in Finland) ----------------------------------------------------------------------

...mirrors Apr 26 17:14:56 localhost kernel: hfs: unable to find HFS+ superblock Apr 26 17:15:05 localhost kernel: VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev md5. # Why does the log complain about HFS+ superblock? The fs should be ext3. - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Suvilahdenkatu 1 B 78 * 00500 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi at greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi

...d_keys -rw-r--r-- 1 git git 631 Feb 12 11:05 known_hosts When, on local machine, I do: $ ssh root at remotehost I get in without a password. But when I do $ ssh git at remotehost I will be asked for a password. What should I check? - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Suvilahdenkatu 1 B 78 * 00500 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi at greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi

I have a Centos 5.6 server which is using the default php packages. These currently contain PHP 5.1.6. My main use of PHP on the server is to support an installation of WordPress. I currently had WP 3.1.2 installed, but the WP developers have announced that from WP 3.2 they will only support PHP 5. and greater. So I investigated and found that the Centos repo contains a series of php53 packages.

Hi, I am using IPFW on FreeBSD 4.11 I am facing two problems: - SSH sessions timeout after a while - When I run "/sbin/ipfw -q -f flush" in the rules script all connection get reset (and I am thrown out of the box). Is this standard functioning of ipfw or do I need to change any configuration? Thanks, Siddhartha

...set 0 deny log logamount 10 > ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 >00300 0 0 set 0 deny log logamount 10 > ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any >00400 4344 1712050 Fri Dec 21 00:23:37 2007 set 0 allow log logamount > 10 tcp from any to any established >00500 0 0 set 0 deny log logamount 10 > ip from any to any frag >00600 4 240 Wed Dec 19 23:05:31 2007 set 0 count icmp from any > to any icmptypes 8 in >00700 8 480 Wed Dec 19 23:05:31 2007 set 0 allow log logamount > 10 icmp from any to any i...

Dear W.D. Do you understand that by adding the rules into kernel space numbered from zero to sixty five thousand five hundred thirty four you may alter the behavior of the rule number sixty five thousand five hundred thirty five can you please define and list the goals you are trying to achieve by altering default rule in the terms you can both explain and understand. ----- Original Message

Hi peeps, After compiling ipfw into the new 6.2 kernel, and typing "ipfw list", all I get is: "65535 deny ip from any to any" From reading the docs, this might indicate that this is the default rule. (I am certainly protected this way--but can't be very productive ;^) ) By the way, when I run "man ipfw" I get nothing. Using this instead: