search for: 004374

Op 25-11-14 om 23:39 schreef Jan Stary: > Is there a reason the test scripts are calling bash? The change from sh to bash was made a little more than a year ago. The mailing list thread accompanying this change can be found here: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-September/004374.html

...hreef Jan Stary: > > Is there a reason the test scripts are calling bash? > > The change from sh to bash was made a little more than a year > ago. The mailing list thread accompanying this change can be > found here: > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-September/004374.html How unfortunate, if I may say so. The main reason is that /bin/sh on linux can mean one of two things; bash in bourne shell comatibility mode or dash. To accomodate a perverse system where /bin/sh does not mean sh(1), but one of two other shells (!), compatibility is broken for systems th...

...; Is there a reason the test scripts are calling bash? > > > > The change from sh to bash was made a little more than a year > > ago. The mailing list thread accompanying this change can be > > found here: > > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-September/004374.html > > How unfortunate, if I may say so. > > The main reason is that /bin/sh on linux can mean one of > two things; bash in bourne shell comatibility mode or dash. > > To accomodate a perverse system where /bin/sh does not mean sh(1), > but one of two other shells (!)...

Hi all, As people may have seen there's a pre-release here: http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ Specifically: flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit binaries Please test. I'm particularly interested in hearing about the windows binaries which were cross compiled from Linux to Windows. Unfortunately there is a bug