Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "0041690f".
2018 Feb 07
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...& runtime hit of
>> thunking ret, I really don't see a good motivation for us teaching the
>> compiler how to do this.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180207/0041690f/attachment.html>
2018 Feb 07
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
Also, could you patch and test Clang with the Linux kernel after I make
this change? I'd like to know that we actually successfully call the
correct thunks and that they behave correctly. I'm not super worried, but
good to actually get this right. I'm am slightly more worried about the
stack-based retpoline than the register ones just due to the overall lower
amount of testing