Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "0020f262".
2016 Mar 09
2
"Do not use Static Constructors" LLVM Coding Standard rule question
a static local still produces a static dtor, though
One of the ways you can get around this is with a deliberate non-cleanup:
const foo &getFoo() {
static const foo &f = *new foo();
return f;
}
that way no global dtor runs. Obviously only works if you don't need foo's
dtor to run.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Craig Topper via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
2016 Mar 09
3
"Do not use Static Constructors" LLVM Coding Standard rule question
...________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160309/0020f262/attachment.html>