search for: 001829

...er the concept of nested > functions (and the corresponding static links) into llvm? This was discussed back in August, which discusses it, provides a solution and an example: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-August/001828.html http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-August/001829.html http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-August/001834.html http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-August/001836.html I don't think that we need anything added to LLVM to support nested functions. -Chris -- http://llvm.org/ http://nondot.org/sabre/

Was there already some reflection about how to lower the concept of nested functions (and the corresponding static links) into llvm? Dirk Muysers.