Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "001718".
Did you mean:
001714
2014 Jul 07
2
PPC asm is disabled since Jan 2005
...rsion 1.1.1 to
build correctly under GNU/Linux/PPC. Only now have I realised that somewhere
along the way something broke in FLAC's decoding. On my machine, roughly 50%
of FLAC files are being decoded incorrectly" -- John Steele Scott
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2005-January/001718.html
"since it is going to take me a while to sort this out, and since
we need to get a release out to fix the sonames problem, I have
disabled PPC asm functions for now and will get back to it after
the release. the static binaries I make for the darwin binary
release will have them though,...
2014 Jul 08
0
PPC asm is disabled since Jan 2005
...ectly under GNU/Linux/PPC. Only now have I realised that somewhere
> along the way something broke in FLAC's decoding. On my machine, roughly 50%
> of FLAC files are being decoded incorrectly" -- John Steele Scott
>
>
> http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2005-January/001718.html
>
> "since it is going to take me a while to sort this out, and since
> we need to get a release out to fix the sonames problem, I have
> disabled PPC asm functions for now and will get back to it after
> the release. the static binaries I make for the darwin binary
>...
2014 Jul 03
4
[PATCH] two patches of doubtful usefulness
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>> There's the following code in stream_decoder.c:
>
> Like you, I don't see a lot of value in these. I think I'll decline
> these.
FLAC__lpc_restore_signal_asm_ia32_mmx compares 'order' argument with 4
and if it's greater then it jumps to FLAC__lpc_restore_signal_asm_ia32.
I wonder why the same wasn't done for PPC/Altivec: