search for: 000251

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "000251".

Did you mean: 0.0251
2020 Feb 17
3
[flang-dev] About OpenMP dialect in MLIR
...compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-May/000197.html <http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-May/000197.html> 2. [June 2019] http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-June/000251.html However I could not find any conclusions for the concerns raised by Kiran: 1. Early outlining (in MLIR) vs. Late outlining (in LLVM) 2. Handling of target constructions: high-level transformations for GPUs and CPUs (offloading in LLVM vs. MLIR?) Kiran seems to suggest...
2020 Feb 18
2
[flang-dev] About OpenMP dialect in MLIR
...-compiler.org/2019-May/000197.html >> <http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-May/000197.html> >> 2. >> >> [June 2019] >> http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-June/000251.html >> >> >> However I could not find any conclusions for the concerns raised by Kiran: >> >> >> 1. >> >> Early outlining (in MLIR) vs. Late outlining (in LLVM) >> 2. >> >> Handling of target constructions: high-level t...
2020 Feb 15
5
[flang-dev] About OpenMP dialect in MLIR
Reply to Kiran Chandramohan: > You are welcome to participate, provide feedback and criticism to change the design as well as to contribute to the implementation. Thank you Kiran. > But the latest is what is there in the RFC in discourse. I have used this as reference for the response. > We did a study of a few constructs and clauses which was shared as mails to flang-dev and the