Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "000251".
Did you mean:
0.0251
2020 Feb 17
3
[flang-dev] About OpenMP dialect in MLIR
...compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-May/000197.html
<http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-May/000197.html>
2.
[June 2019]
http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-June/000251.html
However I could not find any conclusions for the concerns raised by Kiran:
1.
Early outlining (in MLIR) vs. Late outlining (in LLVM)
2.
Handling of target constructions: high-level transformations for GPUs
and CPUs (offloading in LLVM vs. MLIR?)
Kiran seems to suggest...
2020 Feb 18
2
[flang-dev] About OpenMP dialect in MLIR
...-compiler.org/2019-May/000197.html
>> <http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-May/000197.html>
>> 2.
>>
>> [June 2019]
>> http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-June/000251.html
>>
>>
>> However I could not find any conclusions for the concerns raised by Kiran:
>>
>>
>> 1.
>>
>> Early outlining (in MLIR) vs. Late outlining (in LLVM)
>> 2.
>>
>> Handling of target constructions: high-level t...
2020 Feb 15
5
[flang-dev] About OpenMP dialect in MLIR
Reply to Kiran Chandramohan:
> You are welcome to participate, provide feedback and criticism to change
the design as well as to contribute to the implementation.
Thank you Kiran.
> But the latest is what is there in the RFC in discourse.
I have used this as reference for the response.
> We did a study of a few constructs and clauses which was shared as mails
to flang-dev and the