search for: 000243

Hi, I saw your email here http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2005-October/000243.html about the Liebert UPS protocol and I was wondering if it actually got in the NUT tree? I had a look in the 2.2.2 tree but I can only find the closed contact stuff :( -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing a...

...t F18's clang-format file will have a few differences to the global formatting style. These are mainly ones that control alignment of code. We have not come to an agreement as a community on the best way forward here. This flang-dev thread<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-March/000243.html> summarises the debate. We would like to continue this debate after F18 becomes part of the monorepo. [2] llvm_unreachable Previously we stated that we would try to use llvm_unreachable in F18 whenever possible. Presently, F18 has a similar function called die, but this is used to cover mu...

...t F18's clang-format file will have a few differences to the global formatting style. These are mainly ones that control alignment of code. We have not come to an agreement as a community on the best way forward here. This flang-dev thread<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-March/000243.html> summarises the debate. We would like to continue this debate after F18 becomes part of the monorepo. [2] llvm_unreachable Previously we stated that we would try to use llvm_unreachable in F18 whenever possible. Presently, F18 has a similar function called die, but this is used to cover mu...

...mat file will have a few differences to the global > formatting style. These are mainly ones that control alignment of code. We > have not come to an agreement as a community on the best way forward here. > This flang-dev thread > <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-March/000243.html> > summarises the debate. We would like to continue this debate after F18 > becomes part of the monorepo. > > > > [2] llvm_unreachable > > Previously we stated that we would try to use llvm_unreachable in F18 > whenever possible. Presently, F18 has a similar funct...