search for: 000020

...x Initial Comment: superman minimal # ruby -rubygems minimal.rb /usr/lib/ruby1.9/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.0/gems/wxruby-1.9.7-x86-linux/lib/wxruby2.so: [BUG] unknown type 0x22 (0x12 given) ruby 1.9.0 (2007-12-25 revision 14709) [i686-linux] -- control frame ---------- c:0008 p:-34008570 s:0021 b:0021 l:000020 d:000020 TOP c:0007 p:---- s:0019 b:0019 l:000018 d:000018 CFUNC :require c:0006 p:0009 s:0015 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 TOP /usr/lib/ruby1.9/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.0/gems/wxruby-1.9.7-x86-linux/lib/wx.rb:12 c:0005 p:---- s:0012 b:0012 l:000011 d:000011 FINISH :class_eval c:0004 p:---- s:0010 b:0...

...(1); exit; } call routing works properly, but i would like for the rtp not to go thru asterisk, i'm using the canreinvite option, but when i try to make a call, rtp debug still sees rtp passing thru the asterisk. Sent RTP packet to 12.34.56.78:16410 (type 18, seq 063687, ts 035408, len 000020) Got RTP packet from 87.65.43.21:21376 (type 18, seq 000310, ts 074400, len 000030) Sent RTP packet to 12.34.56.78:16410 (type 18, seq 063688, ts 035568, len 000020) Got RTP packet from 87.65.43.21:21376 (type 18, seq 000311, ts 074640, len 000030) 12.34.56.78 public IP of the UA, 87.65.43.21...

...101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-16 > a=ptime:20 > a=maxptime:150 > a=sendrecv > > <------------> > > And when I look at the RTP debugging I see the data from the remote is: > > Got RTP packet from xx.xx.xx.xx:50644 (type 18, seq 001338, ts 610458, len 000020) > > AAArgh! Type 18 is g729. Why on earth is the remote sending me g729 when > I clearly said the only thing I could do was alaw. > > Is this legal? > > Is the other side broken? > It shouldn't be sending it, but as well we should be ignoring it. I believe we do igno...

...000c call_id : 00000001 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_rb 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_bba 0010 max_tsize: 10b8 0012 max_rsize: 10b8 0014 assoc_gid: 00000000 0018 num_contexts: 01 001c context_id : 0000 001e num_transfer_syntaxes: 01 00001f smb_io_rpc_iface 000020 smb_io_uuid uuid 0020 data : 12345778 0024 data : 1234 0026 data : abcd 0028 data : ef 00 002a data : 01 23 45 67 89 ab 0030 version: 00000000 000034 smb_io_rpc_iface 000034 smb_io_uuid uuid 003...

...in32-60\samples\minimal>ruby -rubygems mini.rb C:/Program Files/Applications/Ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/wxruby-2.0.1-x86-mswin32-60/lib/wxruby2.so: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i386-mswin32] -- control frame ---------- c:0008 p:-9088168 s:0021 b:0021 l:000020 d:000020 TOP c:0007 p:---- s:0019 b:0019 l:000018 d:000018 CFUNC :require c:0006 p:0011 s:0015 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 TOP C:/Program Files/Applications/Ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/wxruby-2.0.1-x86-mswin32-60/lib/wx.rb:12 c:0005 p:---- s:0012 b:0012 l:000011 d:000011 FINISH c:0004 p:---- s:0...

hi! $ dovecot --exec-mail ext /usr/lib/dovecot/expire-tool.sh /usr/lib/dovecot/expire-tool.sh: 9: Bad substitution What's the problem, do I miss something? This is the first time, I trying to use expire. This is an Ubuntu 10.04 . Thank you, tamas

...10 alloc_hint: 00000010 | 0014 context_id: 0000 | 0016 cancel_ct : 00 | 0017 reserved : 00 | rpc_api_pipe: len left: 0 smbtrans read: 40 | rpc_api_pipe: fragment first and last both set | 000018 net_io_r_auth_2 | 000018 smb_io_chal | 0018 data: c8 d8 ff bf 3b 5f 0e 08 | 000020 net_io_neg_flags | 0020 neg_flags: 400001ff | 0024 status: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED | cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED | cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed | connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials | to machine PDC-SERVER. Error was : NT...

I'm going to try documenting the various sections as I figure them out, in order to help others who are trying to implement the Theora CODEC. I'll go back and document the stuff I've already done, but I'm starting at the loop filter limits because that is where I ran into my first uncertainties. I found where libtheora did its loop filter limit decoding, and printed out the

I have a ZFS pool that has been corrupted. The pool contains a single device which was actually a file on UFS. The machine was accidentally halted and now the pool is corrupt. There are (of course) no backups and I''ve been asked to recover the pool. The system panics when trying to do anything with the pool. root@:/$ zpool status panic[cpu1]/thread=fffffe8000758c80: assertion failed:

...0 000c call_id : 00000001 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_rb 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_bba 0010 max_tsize: 10b8 0012 max_rsize: 10b8 0014 assoc_gid: 00000000 0018 num_elements: 00000001 001c context_id : 0000 001e num_syntaxes: 01 00001f smb_io_rpc_iface 000020 smb_io_uuid uuid 0020 data : 12345778 0024 data : 1234 0026 data : abcd 0028 data : ef 00 002a data : 01 23 45 67 89 ab 0030 version: 00000000 000034 smb_io_rpc_iface 000034 smb_io_uuid uuid 0034 d...

...004/12/15 14:54:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(577) >| 001d flags: 00 >| [2004/12/15 14:54:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(606) >| 001e size : 0014 >| [2004/12/15 14:54:58, 9] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82) >| 000020 sec_io_access info >| [2004/12/15 14:54:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) >| 0020 mask: a01200a9 >| [2004/12/15 14:54:58, 9] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82) >| 000024 smb_io_dom_sid trustee >| [2004/12/15 14:54:58, 5] rpc_parse/p...

...; a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-16 > a=ptime:20 > a=maxptime:150 > a=sendrecv > > <------------> And when I look at the RTP debugging I see the data from the remote is: > Got RTP packet from xx.xx.xx.xx:50644 (type 18, seq 001338, ts 610458, > len 000020) AAArgh!  Type 18 is g729.  Why on earth is the remote sending me g729 when I clearly said the only thing I could do was alaw. Is this legal? Is the other side broken? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/aster...

...000c call_id : 00000001 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_rb 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_bba 0010 max_tsize: 10b8 0012 max_rsize: 10b8 0014 assoc_gid: 00000000 0018 num_contexts: 01 001c context_id : 0000 001e num_transfer_syntaxes: 01 00001f smb_io_rpc_iface 000020 smb_io_uuid uuid 0020 data : 3919286a 0024 data : b10c 0026 data : 11d0 0028 data : 9b a8 002a data : 00 c0 4f d9 2e f5 0030 version: 00000000 000034 smb_io_rpc_iface 000034 smb_io_uuid uuid 003...

...aping up to be an amazing release. Many thanks go out to everyone who has contributed to it in both large and small ways. The LLVM community is vibrant and growing! Finally, here is the previous status report, the LLVM 1.9 Release: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/2006-November/ 000020.html If you have any questions or comments, please contact the LLVMdev mailing list (llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu)! -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

...iews.llvm.org/D70290. This also includes the clang codegen changes. 2. [July - September 2019] OpenMP dialect for MLIR was discussed / proposed with respect to the f18 compilation stack (keeping FIR in mind). a. flang-dev discussion link: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2019-September/000020.html b. Design decisions captured in PPT: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vU6LsblsUYGA35B_3y9PmBvtKOTXj1Fu/view c. MLIR google groups discussion: https://groups.google.com/a/tensorflow.org/forum/#!topic/mlir/4Aj_eawdHiw d. Target constructs design: http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/fla...

Hi, I have got two production facilities having the same configuration, facility 1-(domain CSW)Samba 3.0.5 PDC running on redhat 9 and 4 member server running the same samba version on redhat 9, facility-2- (domain CSWN)Samba 3.0.5 PDC with 2 domain member server, the domain member server uses winbind to authenticate usersthey connect to the local PDC, I have configured two way trust between the

Hello, I've got a problem with printing on a Windows 2K box. Printing from that box to a samba server via the normal print mechanism works fine. The problem is when the person needs to print to a lpt port. The capture succeeds, but when the file is copied to lpt2 it never gets printed. There are other machines that can do the capture and copy to the lpt port but they are Win 9x. The

...inter handle 0000 data1: 00000000 0004 data2: 00000002 0008 data3: 0000 000a data4: 0000 000c data5: 46 b7 b5 3d 5b 0c 00 00 0014 level: 00000002 000018 spool_io_printer_info_level 0018 level: 00000002 001c info_ptr: 00000001 000020 spool_io_printer_info_level_2 0020 servername_ptr: 00000001 0024 printername_ptr: 00000001 0028 sharename_ptr: 00000001 002c portname_ptr: 00000001 0030 drivername_ptr: 00000001 0034 comment_ptr: 00000001 0038 loca...

...0018 uni_str_len: 0006 [2006/12/14 17:46:10, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(613) 001a uni_max_len: 0006 [2006/12/14 17:46:10, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) 001c buffer : 00000001 [2006/12/14 17:46:10, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82) 000020 smb_io_unihdr hdr_server [2006/12/14 17:46:10, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(613) 0020 uni_str_len: 001e [2006/12/14 17:46:10, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(613) 0022 uni_max_len: 001e [2006/12/14 17:46:10, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642)...

...[3] : 00 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(530) 007e id_auth[4] : 00 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(530) 007f id_auth[5] : 05 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32s(815) 0080 sub_auths : 00000020 00000220 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(60) 000088 smb_io_dom_sid grp_sid [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(530) 0088 sid_rev_num: 01 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(530) 0089 num_auths...